SHOT ON SIGHT …

An eagle eyed Biased BBC reader picks up on this...it has been doctored so that it reads “The Africans risking it all on the Egypt-Israel border” This is what is originally said,,,,

‘Shot on sight, The Africans risking it all to cross into Israel’

The actual story was about Egyptians shooting Africanimmigrants:

In his sparsely decorated apartment, Yahya Mohamed Idris,a refugee from Darfur in Sudan, explains how he risked everything trying to moveto Israel. “I decided to go to Israel because people who wentbefore told me the situation was much better over there,” he says. “I left my country looking for safety and securitybut in Egypt I found harassment and more problems. “Work here is difficult and they throw stones andtomatoes at me on the street. They curse at me and call me ‘the black’.” “While we were crossing the border they openedfire,” Idris recalls.”We surrendered and sat on the ground and theystarted beating us and shooting all around. My wife fainted and the kids werescreaming.” At least 16 sub-Saharan African refugees and migrantshave been shot dead at the border this year. Many others suffered injuries.

Warnings ignored

“This is a common problem. When people try to crossthe border to Israel, the Egyptian security shoot and kill them,” commentsAbdalla Hanzal, who works with a refugee support group.

ACTIVISM UNDERWATER…

I was reading this BBC report on the news that Israel has stopped a Palestinian terrorist attack, this time at sea, as four Palestinian humanitarians wearing diving suits met a watery death. In the first sentence the BBC tell us that Israel has killed four Palestinians. 8 paragraphs later the BBC informs us that “The al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, a militant group linked to Fatah, has reported that four of its men were killed and a fifth is missing.” So, Israel kills terrorists might be a more accurate heading. Given Al-Aqsa’s long track record of cruel and vicious terrorism, calling them “militants” seems as preposterous as calling the Islamic thugs on the Marmara “peace activists.” Given that the BBC portray Al Fatah as the more benevolent side of Palestinians, and given that this was THEIR terror group in action, I’m surprised the BBC has so few questions to ask about it. We know Hamas are sanitised by the BBC, and now so are Fatah.

HOW THEY SPEND OUR MONEY…

The Telegraph reports that the BBC has lavished £1million building a rooftop studio for its World Cup coverage and then wasted thousands more installing a lift so that Shearer, Lineker and Hansen would not have to walk up three flights of stair. (I suppose Shearer might injure himself?) Hasn’t anyone told the BBC we are in a recession – is the age of austerity to be held at bay at the BBC care of the license tax?

BAN ALL GUNS…

Moonbat time on the BBC each Sunday with Nicky Campbell and “The Big Question”. This morning the audience is in fine voice DEMANDING that all guns be banned. Those on the other side of the argument were shouted down. Of course the BBC also believes all guns should be banned so those loons doing the shouting and screaming in the audience are actually articulating the State Broadcasters feelings.

ACTIVIST – REVISIONISM

I was wondering given the BBC’s embrace of the word “Activist” to describe Hamas enablers, should we not produce a new thesaurus to help us translate the propaganda and bias spewed out by the BBC? Late night BBC news proclaiming that Israel was “unmoved” by sight of Irish Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Corrigan being escorted off the “Rachel Corrie”. Why would this question be asked in the first place UNLESS the person asking it had a bias? Were those who carried out  7/7 “activists” also? Loathsome BBC.

GAZA CALLING….

A Biased BBC reader writes..

” A protest is due to be held in Belfast against theIsraeli seizure of an Irish aid ship trying to break the blockade of the GazaStrip.The protest is due to begin at the City Hall at 1600 BST

 Thanks to the BBC for the tip off.”

BBC FOR THE HAMAS ENABLERS

I know we expect little in terms of balance from the BBC and hence we are rarely disappointed, This morning, in fine anti-Israeli form, the BBC runs an item entitled “Israel threatens to board Gaza aid ship Rachel Corrie”. Note the use of the word “threaten” when used next to Israel. Also note how the Hate Flotilla farce is given neutral nomenclature…subtext, they only want to bring aid. To Hamas, By sea. Breaching the blockade.

I was on the BBC yesterday morning and tried to discuss the nature of IHH,  the Turkish organisation behind the Hate Flotilla; I tried to discuss Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Corrigans links to Khalid Meshaal, Hamas leader; Not interested in discussing these key facts. The ONLY issue they wanted to talk about was my comment that Israel MUST ensure the MV Rachel Corrie be stopped and “no messing about”. Of course I was asked to withdraw that comment, I didn’t. The BBC is 100% behind the pro-Hamas Hate Flotillists and it oozes through their every slimy report. In my view.

NO BRAGGING..

I caught the last minute of Any Questions this evening. BBC stalwart Billy Bragg was on the panel (Naturally) and they were discussing how the UK treats our military. Billy, the patriot, informed us he spend a lot of time working with our military…… during his prison visits. He informed us that large numbers of former soldiers end up in jail. On that assertion the programme finished. I KNOW that some former servicemen do end up in prison but the idea that vast numbers of our military are jailbirds is a lie although I think I can see why the BBC salivate at that idea.