Saints and Sinners

Report: The Mail On Sunday's 2015 story about Mr Cox leaving Save The Children


Life changing events?  How to cope with them?  Who to ask?

The BBC chooses Brendan Cox and a survivor of the 7/7 attacks….out of all the survivors they manage to pick a Muslim, one who runs the Jan Trust which teaches that Muslims are right to be angry about the West’s involvement in world affairs [Muslim] and of course about Israel…get angry it says but don’t be violent….deradicalising, anti-extremism…or the opposite?….

British survivors of terror attacks are coming together to offer a new voice for survivors. “Survivors against Terrorism” will campaign for policies to tackle the causes of attacks, and we’re speaking to two of the founders: Brendan Cox, husband of murdered MP, Jo Cox, and Sadja Mughal, who was in the next carriage down from one of the 7/7 bombers, when he detonated his device in London in 2005.

I imagine ‘Survivors against Terrorism’ is going to be a highly political, pretty one-sided affair that tells us the real threat is right-wing extremism and that the Government’s Prevent strategy is failing and is alienating Muslims….the two founders being a very political lefty and a Muslim.  The ‘steering group’ seems weighted against the ‘Right’ with Cox, Mughal, Mike Haines who travels the country lecturing about the wonders of  unity and the horrors of hate crime [right-wing] despite his brother being beheaded in Islam’s name and Dan Hett [ex-BBC] whose main concern is the Far-Right despite his brother being killed in the Manchester bombing.

Can’t find any mention of this on the BBC despite all their concern about sexual abuse…and in light of Cox’s own pious preachings….

Murdered MP Jo Cox’s husband was reported to police over sex assault claim in Harvard bar – nine months before his wife’s death

A new charity sex scandal erupted last night after it emerged that the husband of murdered Labour MP Jo Cox was once accused of groping a senior US government official.

The woman reported Brendan Cox to American police, claiming he assaulted her late at night at Harvard University – although Mr Cox strongly denies the allegation.

Her complaint came soon after Mr Cox quit as a senior executive with the Save The Children in 2015 following separate claims of inappropriate behaviour towards staff.

Mr Cox declined to comment last night, but his lawyers said he denies the ‘spurious allegations’ and says no sexual assault took place.

Take look at this article from the BBC….shame such slanted tosh comes from the respected RUSI…no surprise the BBC is pushing it….co-authored by ….looks like ‘Mo’ may  have had a bit too much influence….commissioned by the BBC…’Co-authored with colleague Mo again, this one focuses on extreme right wing terrorism and its particular expression through lone actors for the BBC.’…..

The clues right-wing terrorists give away

They present this as if it is a major and extensive problem…

Plans to kill by lone individuals such as these have been a persistent feature of the extreme right wing for many years.

It’s a long article in which the first bit is running through some basic groundwork but then we get onto the real message..

None of this paints a picture of particularly sophisticated terrorist plots, or networks, in particular among those on the extreme right.

Rather, it suggests isolated individuals acting out an extreme ideology – and, in most cases, this has been the nature of the plots.

Potentially more worrying for the UK is the emergence of a more organised extreme right wing, with the recent banning of the neo-Nazi group National Action, for example.

Yep, National Action, a tiny group of like-minded souls who get absolutely no traction in mainstream society….unlike Muslim terrorists whose motivations and ideology get widespread support in their own community though most Muslims will say they are against the violent expression of that…as with the Jan Trust.   The communities that feed on conspiracy theories and widespread acceptance of the narrative that the West is attacking ‘Islam’, a narrative that the BBC pushes relentlessly and gives credibility to, are the breeding ground for the terrorists…and help recruit active members, those who facilitate their actions and those who stand by with silent approval doing nothing to stop them.

Here’s the meat and potatoes of the article with a clear attempt to cast the net as wide as possible and implicate anyone who says anything critical of Islam, extreme liberalism or even Marxism bizarrely….

Across the continent, the ideology around far-right extremists is varied and diverse, but some common threads can be found.

Racial “purity” is often highlighted, as are claims that the world is run by powerful elites, including Marxists, liberals and Jews.

Some minority groups are presented as posing a threat to European culture and society.

Er…The Western world is run by liberals…to its great cost in many cases….and some minority groups are presented as a threat to European culture and society…because they are a threat so radically opposed to Western society are they….and the minority groups include Marxists.  Many ‘liberals’, they who see the promotion of interationalism, globalisation [and paradoxically anti-capitalism] and open borders are pretty much aligned with the Marxists as we see with the great and the good at the BBC championing Corbyn.

And here’s the usual refusal to accept any criticism as valid, presumably ‘xenophobic beliefs’ are those criticising Muslims behaving badly ‘in the name of Allah’ and those arguing to control immigration, with the claim that it gives licence to violent extremists and thus is a danger to the glorious multicultural society we live in….so close it down…this is pure Muslim/left wing propaganda trying to control and police what can be said…..

The continued existence of such people – often drawing on the ideology of a more organised extreme right wing, or the xenophobic beliefs of a vocal minority – has a damaging effect on society, causing frictions between communities and tearing at our social fabric.

Not only do their actions hurt those caught up in attacks, but they can drive others on the extreme right, as well violent Islamists – who use the sense of a divided society to justify their actions.

It is easy to simply dismiss Osborne and Stables as pathetic losers angry at society.

But they represent a broader trend that has worrying potential ramifications for the United Kingdom.


Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Saints and Sinners

  1. Fedup2 says:

    I would love to know the amount of resources applied against non Muslim terrorism as against the real enemy – Islamic terrorism and the false religion itself .
    Blokes like Osborne – obviously not the sharpest knife in the box – get the full treatment 43 years whilst we get the ritual handwringing when the inevitable Islamic attack takes place saying “ we couldn’t have stopped it” and “ pull together” nonsense .,

    Mr Cox will use the trauma of his wife’s death to full effect in the same way dame Doreen Lawrence of victimhood did … make a living out of it.,


    • Emmanuel Goldstein says:

      If you count all the police time looking for hate crimes, upset feelings on other people’s behalf, Internet posts, perceived racism and all the other minor so called crimes you might find that the police actually do spend a similar amount of time on non muslim ‘crime’
      That the muslamick crimes usually involve bloody mincemeat bodies, beheadings and as many deaths as possible balances the hurt feeling crime investigations.
      If they were to put out stats, that’s how they would balance them to give the false impression that they were being even handed about it.
      We, on here, know what you mean.


  2. Oaknash says:

    “Survivors against terrorism”. The BBC up to their normal disingenuous tricks again to prove their own political point that the Religion of Peace means us no harm and should be protected. Of course all these particular “reasonable” characters appear to have an axe to grind or their own agenda to follow. Its all the rights fault innit kidz.

    Sadja Mughal – muslim = tick, woman = tick, comes across as a reasonable face of Islam = tick

    Mike Haines – Brother was decapitated in the name of “Allah” But he is the perfect stooge he pushes the “peace and reconciliation” line with those who will only see this as weakness , they pocket any compromises and demand more All I can say about this bloke is that he probably still grief stricken and is looking for some sort of meaning in a meaningless and savage death. Of course the BBC so keen to encourage appeasement on our part could not deny themselves the opportunity of parading this misguided individuals views as the way to go. Maybe Mike needs to chat to a few more Yazdis and see if they share his viewpoint.

    And now we get to Mr Cox.Oh dear – If these nasty “extreme right” newspapers are to be believed it sounds as if the professional widower – St Brendan the Pure may well need to have his halo re-polished again. I am sure Aunty will be more than willing to help after all they have invested rather a lot of energy in buffing up this particular SJW into a cross between Mother Theresa and Christ himself. At the moment there is little evidence to prove this allegation either way. But what I particularly love is how one of the lefts “own” has been tainted with one of their very own weapons the anonymous allegation HO HO HO!

    There is an old expression “you cant polish a turd” I think the BBC may disagree with this . After all with the likes of Saville etc they have successfully been doing this for years. Best start buffing Aunty!


    • RobRoy says:

      “you cant polish a turd” – but the BBC will roll it in glitter to get the result they want!


      • Northern Dreamer says:

        Meanwhile, in the corrupt corridors of the bBBC….
        Yes yes I’ve got it comrades!! Perhaps this ungrateful bitch was in a wheelchair and St Brendan of Cox made her walk again!! Can we spin it like this?!!!!!!!!!


  3. john in cheshire says:

    It seems Mr Cox just can’t keep his hands to himself:

    He’s not really a suitable person to be seen on any public platform, I’d have thought.


    • GCooper says:

      It’s funny, isn’t it? In the wake of the Weinstein affair, the BBC has been quick off the mark to drop anyone against whom even the faintest whisper of scandal had been heard. St Brendan, on the other hand…


    • Emmanuel Goldstein says:

      It’s what Jo would have wanted.


  4. richardofkent says:

    Don’t forget that Brendan Cox was a former special adviser to Gordon Brown and was placed into a highly paid senior position at Save the Children despite having no experience.. He was one of many labour supporters parachuted into third sector organisations (Quangos, charities, Universities, Think Tanks) when they were about to lose power. His sainted wife was another who received a six figure salary to carry out Labour’s bidding whilst Labour were in opposition. They should have all been replaced by the tories in 2010.


  5. GCooper says:

    Agreed. One of the Tories’ greatest failings is their unwillingness to be as ruthless as Labour. They should have cleaned out the so called ‘third sector’. Our charities, quangos, universities etc need culling. As it is they let imbeciles like the atrocious Helen Ghosh flit from sinecure to sinecure, taking their communicable disease of cultural Marxism wherever they go.


    • G.W.F. says:

      Just what was St Jo up to in the middle east? If we had journalists in the MSM they might investigate.
      Seems as if we have a very interesting couple


  6. fakenewswatcher says:

    Richard: The Tories seem to be clueless when it comes to ensuring that a whole variety of institutions of various types need examination when you come to power, because ‘the other side’ may quietly have been filling them with loyalists for thirteen years.
    The biggest elephant in the room there is…you guessed it!
    If we work on the assumption that the Tories have failed to replace Labour enthusiasts from positions of power in hundreds of organisations, including quangos, this immediately casts new light on how much Brexit can expect to bump into opposition from apparently ‘neutral’ commentators. Most of them will be working on the assumption that, if the Tories are trying to push through leave (are they?), then they must undermine that project at all costs.


    • Guest Who says:

      At least, thanks to unique BAME impositions, it won’t be just white.



    • GCooper says:

      To be fair, I suspect part of the problem is that these organisations are the natural environment for Left wingers and normal people wither and die in their stultifying atmospheres. Can you imagine working surrounded by St Brendan types?

      The same is true, of course, at the BBC. Even if someone from the Right managed to get employed by them, how long could they stand working in that hothouse of Marxism (I have known some who tried) and, even if they decided to put up with it, how long before they were hounded out?


      • Oaknash says:

        GC – I think the truth of the matter is that these organisations attract left wingers like blowflies around a dead cat because many of these characters talk much about the “working classes” and “humaniy” yet in reality are workshy and probably consider any sort of manual labour job below their dignity.
        Instead they make all the right political noises get themselves a degree in say “administration” and work themselves into management positions in a charity and abracadabra! – They earn good money for doing very little and get to keep their virtue signalling credentials because they are doing something “worthwhile” rather than the bloke who works at the local abattoir sweeping up the guts or the bloke who digs holes in the road for little money.
        I suppose when you are such a virtuous person working for the good of “humanity”. Who can deny you the occasional little “lapse” if you grab a handful of something nice at a social function – After all you have earnt it , just a pity the right wing “fake news ” media cant see the big picture more and show more respect.


        • GCooper says:

          Absolutely right. I once worked with someone who went to work for Oxfam – she would have fitted your description admirably.


  7. Guest Who says:


    Has Rob Burley become self aware yet?


  8. johnnythefish says:

    ‘Causing frictions between communities…’

    What, like those communities have been living together in harmony?

    Even the BBC’s own Panorama recently showed the extent to which Muslim communities separate themselves physically, socially, ethnically and ideologically. They do not want to be considered British or be part of our culture. They are Muslim first, Pakistani (Bangladeshi, whatever) second and British never. Second, third, fourth generations of them are growing up in areas which have little or no association with indigenous British. We have imported a whole host of mini-Pakistans, Bangladeshes, Somalias and are doing nothing to halt their spread. We will reap the whirlwind of third world degradation – not even the BBC will be spared.


    • Fedup2 says:

      Johnny -I have no desire to know anything about that false religion but I understand there are two brands the suni and the shee er. And that they don’t get on because of someone’s brother in law or something .

      So that would be number two on the list
      Throw in benefits cheats there too as they are good at getting people to work in housing departments and DWP offices for the obvious purpose .

      Def not one for an albeeb investigation
      They’re happier door stepping tommy Robinson or following a police raid on him or someone else the lefty state sees as a white threat


    • Rob in Cheshire says:


      Our muslim community are happy enough to be “British” when it comes to claiming benefits, or having their inbred children treated by the NHS. The passport comes in useful as a travel document of course. Add to that the numerous frauds, such as crash for cash, the industrial rape gangs, the control of the heroin business, not to mention mass terrorism, and I really wonder how we ever managed without them.


  9. GCooper says:

    It’s very significant how on the BBC’s web site rundown of today’s front pages, this story has been relegated below even the usual nonsense dreamed-up by the Express. Clearly, the comrades are rallying around poor, beleaguered St Brendan. I expect his worship to continue unabated.


    • Fedup2 says:

      And it’s only 4 months to the anniversary . Flags flowers and false mourning all around


  10. StewGreen says:


  11. Emmanuel Goldstein says:

    Is everyone who has received any money from Oxfam going to return it the same as the places returning money from the presidents club charity.
    Which is worse, buying sex from prostitutes or a bit of banter.

    I think we need to see the chart the politically correct use to rate their offensive levels (a very big chart I would guess)
    I just don’t know where we stand as there’s so much offensiveness about I don’t know what to think anymore.
    Best be safe and find offence in absolutely everything as the left appear to do.


  12. Tabs says:

    Brendan Cox tweeted that he is pissed up and wants to sleep on the train whilst his kids can look after themselves. I don’t think he was expecting replies like these…


  13. Swelter says:

    Cant find any reference to the living saint that is Brendon Cox on the BBC. What has gone wrong? .Would have thought that they might have scrambled a helicopter or two and a couple of news teams to doorstep him. Perhaps after this we will be spared any of his speeches and bon homies in the near future at least.


    • Oaknash says:

      Oh Brendan, Brendan – Wherefore art thou?

      Art thou pissed?


    • StewGreen says:

      The media will give the excuse that they are protecting the children
      and I wouldn’t discount that
      however the same media don’t apply the same standard to other accused men.
      So it’s a double standard.


  14. StewGreen says:

    R5 Phone-in this morning, first expert said
    “International under age Sex tourism is a crime under UK law
    .. so the fact that Oxfam had some evidence, but chose not to go to the Met Police
    means Oxfam seems to break UK law
    ..they should take their dossier to the Met Police even today.”

    So yes the 7 were moved away from those possible victims by resigning or sacking, but that was not enough.
    For a start their is a possibility that they just move to other countries to commit crimes.

    Yes to me although it’s likely that many expat workers will use prostitution even if it’s against local law, the aid industry is something special in that it’s work brings their staff into contact with vulnerable under age people.
    There have been many instances in the past of foreign deviants walking into work at orphanages etc. to get access to male/female victims.


  15. StewGreen says:

    Times Oxfam cartoon


  16. EnglandExpects says:

    The thing that has struck me since Muslim violence began
    in this country has been the LACK of reaction from the indigenous population . Apart from violence, the very culture of Britain is under attack, aided by the BBC of course. These phenomena – mass immigration by an incompatible religious culture, violence by members of that religious culture and an attack on the values of the indigenous population, is unprecedented in European history sincere the fall of the Roman Empire.
    Sooner or later we will say ‘ we won’t put up with this any longer’. But so far that hasn’t happened and the only violent acts by white British people against Muslims or Muslim appeasers have been in the guise of Mair and Osbourne. Truly remarkable . Both had mental health issues but were dispatched with quick, arguably unfair trials and long prison sentences by an establishment determined to teach white Britons a lesson.
    Brendan Cox and similar hypocrites and charlatans who raise the false spectre of an active and significant ‘far right’ are liars.
    The suitably named and distinctly creepy Cox should be treated with the disdain he deserves.


  17. evad666 says:

    Spotted this in the Telegraph:-
    The only thing the Socialist/Marxist model has going for it is its packaging. Wherever that model has been tried it has only delivered misery,poverty and the abrogation of human rights. The left’s superior packaging, compassion, caring for the vulnerable, egalitarianism, world peace etc still resonates, particularly with young people. Anything that threatens to damage that packaging must be ignored and covered up as fast as possible. The President’s club debacle made the left’s packaging gleam more brightly, hence all the noise. Oxfam, Kids Club, Rotherham, miscarriages of justice in rape cases, the persecution of elder statesman relying on the testimony of a deluded person, rampant antisemitism in the Labour Party, these must be ignored. If our national broadcaster had a shred of integrity it would hold the left’s feet to the fire on these issues, but it doesn’t,so it won’t.