Cheap and Nasty



You always know you have a stupid, lazy, unpleasant, cowardly comedian when they go for Trump.  They know that they are guaranteed some applause from a certain segment of the audience if they sneer at Trump and make some asinine joke about him, it doesn’t even have to be funny or true…just say ‘Trump’ and you’ll get the applause.  They of course won’t do jokes that are seen as in his favour as to do so would result in Twitter going into meltdown and their credibility as a right-on comedian left in tatters.  They just aren’t brave enough to do real funny, they just go for the group-think tribal self-confirming comfort blanket of anti-Trumpism.  It would be like a white comedian making jokes about Obama because he’s black to a KKK meeting.  Anti-Trumpism is a sort of racism, it’s bigotry, stupidity and cowardice.  The same comedian of course would never make jokes about Mohammed and Islam despite the extraordinary horrors done in the name of Allah.

‘Comedian’ Desiree Burch on the News Quiz is that lazy, bigoted comedian who instead of thinking up some real jokes goes for the low hanging fruit of the Trump.   She laughs at his Tweet about the NHS being in crisis and sneers that he gets his news from Fox…how they laughed.  Only Trump was really just ‘retweeting’ the extremists of the BBC, the Labour Party and the activist doctors and nurses who agitate on behalf of the Labour Party and whose constant drumbeat has been of an NHS in crisis but who suddenly all now agree that the NHS is the best health service in the world.

So a chance to make a joke about the hypocrisy of those who have weaponised the NHS and told constant lies about it and another chance to reference Trump retweeting extremist material not by ‘Britain First’ but by ‘Britain Last’ the BBC et al.  But no…go for the easy laugh from your unthinking tribal groupies….don’t challenge them, don’t challenge yourself with some original thought.

It’s the same with thoughtless, partisan politicians who go for that easy applause as Stephen Kinnock did on Any Questions [again the audience seemingly packed with lefties…or a very vocal minority] when he claimed Trump was the problem when it came to North Korea.  Apparently Trump has only made things worse there and he needs to tone his rhetoric down.  Yep, that has worked really well for decades hasn’t it as North Korea totally ignored everything ‘diplomatic’ Presidents have said?  Kinnock is either a fool or bigoted liar prepared to make totally untrue statements for his own ends….intended to make Stephen Kinnock look good [but failing, like father, like son]…‘Trump, what a crass, dangerous and stupid fellow ha ha ha!…clap me now!’

Trouble is what is going on over there directly relates to Trump’s sabre rattling which was intended to, and did, scare the Chinese who then imposed sanctions on North Korea…and now we see North Korea at least going through the motions of trying to be more friendly to South Korea…will it last?  Who knows but it is due to Trump, his sabre rattling backing up a good deal of behind the scenes diplomacy.

Shame Dimbleby then referred to Kinnock’s interpretation as if it was the reality and that Trump really did have to tone down his language…doesn’t he?

Kirsty Wark on Newsnight continued in similar anti-Trump vain with some stupid comments that made no attempt to make a fair assessment or judgement on Trump’s claim that CNN [and all the rest] has been pumping out fake news, it has.  Wark, as is the standard BBC line, claims Trump [apparently now a ‘despot’] is wrong and the MSM, the BBC, is totally blameless and trustworthy….might say such shameless white-washing and stone-walling comments defending the MSM prove her completely wrong and Trump right….H/T Sue at Is the BBC biased? for the quote….

“Aren’t you aiding the despots who say “it’s all about fake news from CNN even the BBC, so we won’t believe it?” You are aiding people by undermining the probity of the mainstream media?” 

‘Probity of the mainstream media’…ho, ho,ho….and you still believe in Father Christmas, unicorns and man-made climate change.



Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Cheap and Nasty

  1. chrisH says:

    But who is listening?
    We all know what Newsnight and Question Time are about. A desperate rearguard action to get some mock up or tribute to “truth” back into their bottle. But we`ve seen Laurie Penny (described as a journalist on your clip_fake news continued) get rumbled by David Starkey.
    Nobody cares what the BBC put out-not funny, not truthful and a huge pile of public sector gauleiter soundtrack for Soros and Hillary.
    Don`t watch them, and do NOT feed the trolls.


    • vesnadog says:

      “But who is listening?”

      Will those traitors at the BBC not realise that it was the likes of these two BBC programmes that caused the undecided voters to turn away from voting “remain”

      A year or so on. And we are sure glad we switched onto your bias programmes, you did the UK a great service!

      So, carry on BBC you are doing a very fine job for us Brexit lovers!


      • Fedup2 says:

        Chris / ves

        It accords with my view about the bubble talking and laughing to itself . The “right ons”
        Kidults and other liberals in metro city boroughs interbreeding are the customers for this stuff . It’s what they want to hear .

        So across the country decent people roll their eyes and hit the off switch . I really would like to know the viewing numbers – a proper organisation would pull the plug but since there is a continuos tax stream al beeb need not care

        Others here have reasoned that there is a need to little to Marr, Toady and the many others carrying the al beeb editorial line and bear witness but I think there is a strong need to ration exposure . 5 minutes of eddy nightmare is enough for me –


  2. Nibor says:

    What is a journalist ?

    Well I have a press card , I bet Laurie Penny has one , Anne Coulter will have one and so should Kirsty Wark .

    Josef Goerbels was a journalist , as were those employed by his ministry . Likewise with the USSR.

    Do all good journalists get an outlet for their work ? No .
    Can bad journalists get a outlet for their work ? Yes .

    Does the internet help good journalists ? Yes
    Can it help bad journalists ? Yes .

    Do we get fake news on the BBC ? Yes
    Do we get fake news on the Internet ? Yes

    Can we easily counter fake news on the BBC ? No
    Can we easily counter fake news on the Internet ? Yes .


  3. G.W.F. says:

    In the video clip far left Laurie Penny teams up with the BBC’s anti Trumper to defend journalism and the MSM.

    It is time to recognise a distinction between activists and journalists.
    Penny is primarily an activist and the BBC is recruiting them for its various news outlets.


  4. scribblingscribe says:

    Love the way Laurie Penny, writer for The Guardian and New Statesman is invited to offer her view and then calmly listened to, whilst Ann Coulter is thrown a defensive line which she has to first correct before then trying to put over a point. As Coulter did made her arguements Kirsty shrieked over the top of her.

    Does Kirsty count fake news as including the BBC lying about a polish man being murdered by those who voted Brexit? Does it include the BBC sacking journalists who were investigating paedophile groups within the BBC? Does it include Newsnight saying that the temperature of the world will rise by 4 degrees by 2030 …. And so it goes on.

    The reason people go to web sites for their news over the BBC is because of events like Rotherham, the worst atrocity to occur on mainland UK soil since the war and wholly avoided by the BBC.


  5. Guest Who says:

    Kirsty Doesn’t Do Despots. Apparently.


    And there is always Katty Kay for their proud of sagging-boob peroxide-dipped impartiality in Washington.


  6. AsISeeIt says:

    Ann Coulter missed a trick as Wark introduces her as “right wing” but in contrast introduces our Penny Red as “writer”

    Possibly million book selling Coulter had never previously heard of this BBC much favoured lefty?


  7. G.W.F. says:

    The way to respond to Mssss Laurie Penny


    • Fedup2 says:

      The problem with discussing the likes of ms penny ( Or is it cent ?) or that other fashionably lefty loon afriaa? Is that it gives them a kind of authority to enter the public discourse as opposed to people like me who in essence is the on line version of a ‘bloke in a decent right wing pub’ I would have to moderate my view in a pub and I do here – otherwise the public order laws would kill me .

      These kidults win “fame “ when given an airing and noted historians make the mistake of 1 . Sitting on the same platform 2. Biting back .

      I can’t say what I’d do with that young thing but you might guess – and it’s not a valentines card


    • NCBBC says:

      Ms Penny – another penny grabbing, men hating feminist-socialist.


  8. Richard Pinder says:

    Real scientific experts in Climate science such as Solar Astronomers, Atmospheric Physicists and Meteorologists, cannot hold meetings on University property due to left-wing administrators. Their meetings are also censored by the mainstream media. For the last ten years these people have been fully aware of fake news on the BBC.

    For me and many others, it started when the BBC told Mensa members complaining about the atrociously poor quality of science and mistakes in a BBC Climate Change documentary. The BBC said that the documentary was ok because the makers of the documentary said so, and that the BBC had held a seminar of the best scientific experts to advise the BBC on its Climate Change policy. But then those on the seminar panel turned out to consist of left-wing environmental activists, without a single scientific expert in Atmospheric Physics or Solar Astronomy.

    As far as is known, the BBC is still advised by fake experts who as has been speculated, have no knowledge of thermodynamics. The BBC also told Mensa members that it hadn’t any scientific investigative journalists, presumably because the BBC needs low IQ middle-class left-wing Guardian reading useful idiots, if it wants fake news about Climate Change.

    So the correct statement would be:

    “Is not the BBC aiding the people who say “it’s all about fake news from the BBC, so we won’t believe it?” The BBC is aiding people by undermining the probity of the mainstream media?”


    • Arthurp says:

      Here’s the full list of the scientific advisors
      BBC Television Centre, London
      Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
      Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
      Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
      Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
      Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
      Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
      Trevor Evans, US Embassy
      Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
      Anuradha Vittachi, Director,
      Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
      Claire Foster, Church of England
      Saleemul Huq, IIED
      Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
      Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
      Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
      Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
      Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
      Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
      Matthew Farrow, CBI
      Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
      Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
      Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
      Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
      Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
      Joe Smith, The Open University
      Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
      Anita Neville, E3G
      Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
      Jos Wheatley, Global Environment Assets Team, DFID
      Tessa Tennant, Chair, AsRia
      BBC attendees:
      Jana Bennett, Director of Television
      Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
      Helen Boaden, Director of News
      Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
      Anne Gilchrist, Executive Editor Indies & Events, CBBC
      Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
      Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning
      Elizabeth McKay, Project Executive, Education
      Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
      Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
      Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
      George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
      Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
      John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
      Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
      Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
      Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
      Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures [email protected]

      BBC Television Centre, London (cont)
      Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
      Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
      Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
      Paul Brannan, Deputy Head of News Interactive
      Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
      Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
      Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
      Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
      Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes
      Frances Weil, Editor of News Special Events


    • NCBBC says:

      BBC is a Hard Left fake news tax payer funded organisation like Radio Moscow.


  9. NCBBC says:

    Roman Colosseum to Be Lit Blood Red for Persecuted Christians

    See Open Doors. Most of this bloody persecution and murder is in Islamic countries and North Korea. Surprisingly, India is in the top dozen of extreme persecution of Christians. Even Saudi Arabia is better then India.


    • Annunaki says:

      RE above that would involve another list of whos who in the media


    • Holly Selassie says:

      To be fair to Muslims.
      If even only one of them gets attacked in Bosnia or in Iraq-the howls around the world now mean that nuns in Pakistan or Copts in Egypt get lynched.
      This is just a pretext to them, but there is an “umma” notion that means that one Muslim under an attack(confected or real) is the whole damned Islamic world . And revenge is assured.
      Compare and contrast with what happens to captured Libyan Christians or Egyptian Copts on a bus to a pilgrimage. Or indeed Christians that dare to pray on a dinghy heading for Lampedusa when Muslims take against them. Now then-if YOU were to choose a faith…which one would best defend your interests?
      The Christians have no courage, no convictions and no care for their suffering brothers and sisters. Yes, there ARE great people like the Barnabas Trust and Caroline Cox at Open Doors. But Welby and Nichols are Muslim ciphers, gutless like Pope Francis.
      Islam is the strong black horse-the weak Christian and Godless west amalgam is a weak white nobbled gelding only fit fot Fray Bentos or the knackers yard.
      Bin Laden was correct. My paraphrase, but his point.


  10. Holly Selassie says:

    We`re not paying our license. Just saw Pointless where Osman and Armstrong cite Trump as being the recipient of a Golden Raspberry Award for being a bad actor, Both these lads are talented and conservative with a small “c”, but they chose to read this out by way of a question.
    A casual and totally predictable drive by as ever against Trump-in the run up to the news, why let the bile stop for just ten minutes?
    So we`re off. April 30th-it`ll be anything but the bloody BBC anyhoo.