Want to fight Brexit? Have fewer immigrants


[Thanks to Guest Who for the Tweet above]

The BBC et al always demand that we take in more and more immigrants…more are better for the economy, for diversity, for cheap plumbers and nannies for BBC grandees.  The BBC is a bit of an extremist when it comes to immigration as it campaigns for open borders and limitless immigration into the UK without regard to the real, rather than the imagined, effects that this will have upon the economy, society and the environment.

Ironically the Guardian, which also loves immigration, is headlining with this…

Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children

So fewer people is better for the environment.  Why then does the BBC et al keep on insisting we cram this country to the gunnels with more and more people, so many of them who don’t share our values and beliefs and, as we already see, are prepared to take up force to make their own culture the dominant one?

Crowded cities, crowded roads, landscapes that turn from green into concrete, schools packed, the NHS in crisis, housing shortages and massive prices, water shortages, pollution rising, energy use up, workers on the dole or on low wages, productivity down, violence, crime and drugs up.

What’s not to like about mass, uncontrolled immigration?

The environment is not just the green stuff…you should be able to walk the streets in safety and live your life as you always have done as a citizen of a free, liberal, democratic western state.  Can you now?

Also note the huge hypocirsy as the right-on Guardian attacks golden boy Macron for his comments on birth control…

Brand new Macron, same old colonialism

The French president’s casual slur against Francophone Africans over birth control bodes ill for a progressive French presidency. Plus ça chang.

France’s newly elected president, Emmanuel Macron, when asked in a press conference at the G20 summit in Hamburg why there was no Marshall plan for Africa, explained that Africa had “civilisational” problems. He added that part of the challenge facing the continent was the countries that “still have seven to eight children per woman”.

The condemnation online was swift and relentless.

As people have noted the Guardian has posted a picture of 3 very white babies and pointed the finger at the West for population overload…never mind the population in the West has been declining…hence the Guardian and BBC have been urging us to import a ready made population from African and Muslim countries.  The BBC and the Guardian cannot be trusted in the slightest to give us the real news when race and religion are involved, even as the war drums beat and there is blood on the streets they still try to silence those who see what is coming as what many call the invasion of Europe continues.


Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Want to fight Brexit? Have fewer immigrants

  1. Oldspeaker says:

    Follow the above link to the Guardian, notice anything about the babies in the picture? hmmmm…. so much wrong with it in relation to over population I don’t know where to start, suffice to say, no agenda there then.


    • Ian Rushlow says:

      It’s not even subtle. The article on the Guardian explicitly states “an American is responsible for 40 times the emissions produced by a Bangladeshi” i.e. White people bad, Brown people good is the message and it is subliminally advocating ethnic cleansing. The thing which never seems to occur to Leftists is that when a “noble savage” is removed from his natural low-Carbon environment and enticed to Europe or America, his Carbon footprint increases to that associated with the host country. In other words, anyone who believes in and is concerned about Global Warming should be fundamental opposed to Third World immigration. But then, intellectual consistency and vigour are hardly hallmarks of the Left.


      • Alan says:

        Yes, trouble is it is the growth in third world population looks like it has been the cause of global warming if you believe the link to CO2….as the population increased [and white, western population decreased] the CO2 emissions went up and so did temperature in a linear fashion….a ‘hockey stick’ that the climate change fanatics don’t want to look at usually. They cut down forests which is one of the biggest drivers of change to the atmosphere and then burn the wood for their cooking…usually having fires going all day.

        ‘Deforestation and forest degradation accounts for nearly 20 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, more than the entire global transportation sector.’

        ‘A study from WWF claims that converting the forests and peat swamps of just one Sumatran province into plantations for pulpwood and palm oil is generating more annual greenhouse gas emissions than the Netherlands..or equivalent to 58% of Australia’s total annual emissions, or 39% of the UK’s annual emissions, the report says, and is endangering local elephant and tiger populations.’




  2. Pounce says:

    Meanwhile the message from the bBC:

    and just in case you didn’t get the message, the bBC repeats it in bold:

    The irony here is the very people who are are calling the British racists and xenophobes for not wanting to remain in the EU. The ones who demand we remain signed up to the EU charter of human rights (As apparently it means we are all safeguarded by law) are demanding we take in Adults Children from the very same EU, as their Human rights are been abused.


    • Grant says:


      The hypocrisy is breath-taking. Beyond belief. As for child migrants being drawn to the UK for cricket, what a joke. Do idiot Beeboids do realise that these kids have been coached in lying not in cricket. And the BBC are part of the Big Lie. BBC, World Leaders in Fake News.


  3. Cranmer says:

    I trust they did a similarly emotional report on the VD show about the poor Polish lorry driver that was killed when his lorry was hijacked by ‘migrants’ at Calais?


  4. Guest Who says:

    The house journal of course paves the way.


  5. MarkyMark says:

    Is this something Douglas Murray author of The Strange Death of Europe (amazon affiliate link) would write or say ….

    “Because when immigration is too high (no figure given), when the pace of change is too fast, it’s impossible to build a cohesive society. It’s difficult for schools and hospitals and core infrastructure like housing and transport to cope. And we know that for people in low-paid jobs, wages are forced down even further while some people are forced out of work altogether. … So there is no case, in the national interest, for immigration of the scale we have experienced over the last decade.”

    … well it’s actually …
    Theresa May as Home Secretary
    // Speech to the Conservative Party Conference – in full / 06.10.2015


  6. haleys comet says:

    You have to ask the question..
    Are these Guardian journalists..readers ..etc as thick as two short planks!?
    Oh no…!!
    As a Guardian reader you are an intellectual..!,,,LOL….
    A cut above the plebs..the proles!
    If you read the Guardian ,,you are one of us..
    Vince..Clegg etc etc list goes on and on!
    Superior to all those brexiteers
    All those old farts who have not heard of the NWO…
    We at the Guardian are guarding your future in the United States of EUROPE!!
    So shut your gobs and conform!!
    We must be influential because the BBC buys £ 134,000 of our newspapers every year
    Now that’s what we call power of the press!!


  7. MarkyMark says:

    Two Muslim children, both sisters, missed a school class photograph in The Hague during Eid al-Adha and as a result, the school has compensated the pair 500 euros. Their parents had demanded 10,000. … The mother of the pair originally wanted 10,000 euros for the incident and said during the trial: “Do you know how it feels when your five-year-old daughter enters the classroom every day looks at the picture and asks, ‘Mommy, why I’m not here?’ and you can not explain it to the child?” {jihadwatch / jul2017}

    Let me have a go – you decided as a parent not to be there, so you child was not in the photo, but they had the option to go if you really wanted to. Freedom of choice. You put religion above your child’s happiness. Does that explain it?

    – how much did the trial cost and how long did it take? (not shown)

    Also, I’m sure a photo does not cost €500 or €10,000 – would it not have been better to get the girl’s class to sit in front of the school and the girl to be included, us a mobile phone to take a photo then give the school the €500 – which would help everyone in the school? €500 will never replace a school photo, nor would €10,000. Of course the real outcome will be for the school to submit to time things around Religion, this is a double win in the eyes of the religious.

    Pay for the rope that will choke you..


    • Grant says:


      So much for Aniconism in Islam !


      • MarkyMark says:

        Nice new word ‘Aniconism’ – thanks. The other cost is in time and effort – imagine the court system being flooded with such cases. How many cases would it take to grind the system down? A hidden cost or unintended consequence. Of course once a precedence has been set … spread the word!


        • Grant says:


          ” Against Icons “. But I don’t think the ancient Greeks used it, though not coined by me. So the portrayal of “sentient beings ” is , at least frowned upon in Islam, if not specifically banned in the Koran. Now we have a muslim complaining that she did not get a photo of her daughter. Hypocrisy ? What hypocrisy ?


          • MarkyMark says:

            “Those who will be most severely punished by Allaah on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers.”
            Don’t these judges have Google?


            • Grant says:


              LOL !!!


              • Grant says:


                PS. One thing Leftoids and Beeboids have in common with muslims is that they have no sense of humour. But, I have to correct myself. I know many muslims who have a sense of humour but they are , what they would call in Gambia, “plastic muslims ” !


  8. MarkyMark says:

    BBC Parliament… Brexit… overseas territories … not much impact and looking forward to global trade opportunities. Looking forward to BBC version…


  9. Amounderness Lad says:

    In 1956, before large scale immigration and Britain was virtually all white British, the population total was 51.6 million. By the 2011 census the white British population stood at 51.7 million.

    That means that the white British population during that period has remained virtually static. In that same period the total British population has risen from that 51.6 million to a total of 65.5 million, an increase which is made up of either non-British immigrants or their descendants. And about half of that increase in immigration has occurred since 2000.

    Now who was it the bBBC were trying to blame for the massive increase in the world population which, in the same period has increased from 2.9 billion in 1958 to a current level of 7.5 billion.

    But, of course, the bBBC would never let small facts like that get in the way of their endemic anti-British propaganda and their penchant for broadcasting Fake News to further the bBBC’s own blatant political agenda.


    • Pounce says:

      We watched a repeat of the Two Ronnie from 1976 last night . Very few non white seen.


  10. TruthSeeker says:

    Biased BBC is the world’s worst website, the term “immigrant” is used with the frequency of a Pavlovian dog, and with about the same discriminatory faculty, next to none.

    Immigrants, if the UK, the West in general, needed genuine immigrants, which we do not, whom should we choose? That is WE are doing the choosing.

    We might, and we should, choose to have no additional population. For various reasons, all aired very frequently on this website.

    To answer my own question, we should choose intelligent, cultured, civilised people. People with a history of industry and achievement. Like the Japanese. For the same reason we would select the Japanese we would reject the very people who have actually arrived, the blacks and the Muslims.

    We can reject these people at any time since an incoming government is not bound bound by the decisions of its predecessors.

    The influx of these inadequates and nasties, was not immigration, it was invasion. They must be expelled.

    Before dealing with the foreign invaders we must deal with the home grown traitors, mainly the Labour Party.
    The nastiest organisation in British history. So nasty they had to import our enemies to vote for them.

    I will vote for any organisation with the correct policy on this treason. The Labour Party and its siblings must be banned. New laws must apply to this treason in the past, the culprits must be executed, as they so richly deserve.