Pankaj Mischief


The Obligation of Jihad

“Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) hath Allah promised good. But those who strive and fight hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,” Quran Chapter 4: The Women, verse 95

Graeme Wood’s The Way of the Strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State reminds us of something that ought to be obvious: Islamic State is very Islamic. “The reality is,” Wood wrote, “that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic.” “The notion that religious belief is a minor factor in the rise of the Islamic State,” he observes, “is belied by a crushing weight of evidence that religion matters deeply to the vast majority of those who have travelled to fight.”


Pankaj Mishra, someone so pro-Islam it must hurt.  Someone so pro-Islam that he is in complete denial about the very real effect of the ideology upon its devotees.  Someone so pro-Islam the BBC would inevitably want to exploit his thinking.

We’ve already had a look at Pankaj Mishra’s first outing on Book of the Week and concluded that it’s no coincidence that his pro-Islam, anti-Trump, anti-Brexit, anti-Hindu rhetoric gets pride of place on the BBC and that perhaps ‘Butterflies and Wheels’ is correct when they conclude about his writing that….‘It’s ugly, nasty, bullying, innuendo-laden stuff…. patronizing clueless nonsense.’

Listening to today’s serving and it just confirms my initial thoughts as we get a determined defence of Islam and the usual narrative that is peddled by the BBC and Muslim activists in the UK trying to distance ISIS from their own radical activities.

What we got was an attempt to airbrush Islam out of the picture as he tried to suggest that Muslim terrorists had no  religious intentions but were in fact religiously illiterate and driven by globalisation not religion….there is no scriptural imperative…which kind of ignores the facts on the ground.  He tells us that ISIS recruits are all petty criminals with a liking for drink, drugs and women and whose knowledge of Islam is limited to what they can glean from ‘Islam for Dummies’.   That’s of course a narrative pushed by the likes of Mehdi Hassan, who as a Shia has no liking for the Sunni ISIS but is himself an Islamist. A narrative that deliberately ignores all the highly educated and devout recruits who head out to Syria to join ISIS….the same sort of people who, had they remained in the UK, would be fêted by the BBC as devout Muslims in need of protection from the Islamophobes.

So all those Muslim terrorists who do it in the name of Islam, all those terrorists who shout Allah Akbar as they pull the trigger, all those Muslims who rush to join a fundamentalist Islamic State, they’re none of them real Muslims.

But again we’ve looked at this many times…and that’s a narrative that’s a huge lie…it has everything to do with Islam and until you accept that truth you will never find a solution.

Tom Holland: We must not deny the religious roots of Islamic State

Salafism today is probably the fastest-growing Islamic movement in the world. The interpretation that Isis applies to Muslim scripture may be exceptional for its savagery – but not for its literalism. Islamic State, in its conceit that it has trampled down the weeds and briars of tradition and penetrated to the truth of God’s dictates, is recognisably Salafist. When Islamic State fighters smash the statues of pagan gods, they are following the example of the Prophet; when they proclaim themselves the shock troops of a would-be global empire, they are following the example of the warriors of the original caliphate; when they execute enemy combatants, and impose discriminatory taxes on Christians, and take the women of defeated opponents as slaves, they are doing nothing that the first Muslims did not glory in.

Such behaviour is certainly not synonymous with Islam; but if not Islamic, then it is hard to know what else it is.


Then how about an expert on ISIS?  Could he tell  us if the religion of peace is the source of so much trouble?  You betcha…

Graeme Wood’s The Way of the Strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State reminds us of something that ought to be obvious: Islamic State is very Islamic.

Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future. In Islamic State’s propaganda, they certainly are. Sayings attributed to Muhammad that foretold how the armies of Islam would defeat the armies of the Cross serve their ideologues as a hall of mirrors. What happened in the Crusades is happening now; and what happens now foreshadows what is to come.

How much does Islamic State actually believe this stuff? The assumption that it is a proxy for other concerns – born of US foreign policy, or social deprivation, or Islamophobia – comes naturally to commentators in the West. Partly this is because their instincts are often secular and liberal; partly it reflects a proper concern not to tar mainstream Islam with the brush of terrorism.

“The reality is,” Wood wrote, “that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic.” The strain of the religion that it was channelling derived “from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam” and was fixated on two distinct moments of time: the age of Muhammad and the end of days long promised in Muslim apocalyptic writings. Members of Islamic State, citing the Quran and sayings attributed to the Prophet in their support, believe themselves charged by God with expediting the end of days. It is their mandate utterly to annihilate kufr: disbelief. The world must be washed in blood, so that the divine purpose may be fulfilled. The options for negotiating this around a table at Geneva are, to put it mildly, limited.

“The notion that religious belief is a minor factor in the rise of the Islamic State,” he observes, “is belied by a crushing weight of evidence that religion matters deeply to the vast majority of those who have travelled to fight.”

When Wood asks Hamza Yusuf, an eminent Berkeley Sufi, to demonstrate the group’s errors by relying only on the texts revealed to the Prophet, he struggles to do so: “Yusuf could not point to an instance where the Islamic State was flat-out, verifiably wrong.” This does not mean that it is right but it does suggest – despite what most Muslims desperately and understandably want to believe – that it is no less authentically Islamic than any other manifestation of Islam.

The achievement of Wood’s gripping, sobering and revelatory book is to open our eyes to what the implications of that for all of us may be.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someone
Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Pankaj Mischief

  1. Spider says:

    Having worked in a job for two years where I had to read a daily report on terrorist activities, I can say with a degree of confidence that Mr woods statement is 100% correct. The view often portrayed in the media that Isis recruits are drawn by the rock star image is codswallop. All are devout and firmly believe that the world will be a better place under Islamic rule. They are willing to lay down their life for this dream. We should rightfully fear this group.
    Having said that the enemy I truly fear is the one within. The BBC apologizers, and every apologiser needs challenged at every opportunity. When a friend or family member voices any rhetoric from the BBC, challenge them. You read this site and have an understanding of the threat the BBC is. Consider it a duty open their eyes to the sham they are shown.


    • Expat John says:

      Well said, Spider.
      “Consider it a duty open their eyes to the sham they are shown.”

      A duty that is incumbent on all of us. There is no doubt that the tide is turning our way, but the forces ranged against us are formidable: great in number, immensely well funded, powerful and above all well entrenched throughout the echelons of governments, education and media.
      They have influenced countless millions with their world view, their denial, their ceaseless propaganda. Their thinking is en-grained in every product of modern schools throughout the west, to the extent that those first brainwashed are now the educators themselves, and the prevailing orthodoxy is something that would have Gramsci amazed at their success.
      Against the are ranged ordinary people, the people who go to work every day and see the reality, the struggle to look after their families; these people know, far more than the self-appointed “intelligentsia”, the true levels of crime, of inner-city ghettos, and the pressure on the infrastructure, that their policies have created. No private schools or leafy enclaves for the likes of the ordinary folk, no, just put up with it you morons, we know better than you.
      The tide may have turned – but unless all of us take up our duty, as Spider says, we risk being overwhelmed by the onslaught of Goliath: after all, we have work to do to pay the taxes, to keep our families and our homes, we do not have the luxury of time on our hands to fight all the idiots all of the time.

      Duty indeed. Take up arms, metaphorically. If we do not, we may need to delete the ‘metaphorically’ from the last sentence.


    • embolden says:

      Fully agree spider, one technique used by those who have tried to convert me is to misrepresent Christianity in such a way as to suggest that Islam is “just the same” as Christianity.

      I suspect this is difficult to counter when ones religious and cultural knowledge is derived from BBC sources that propagate the idea that “all religion is the same”.

      Well it isn’t but you have to have a clear understanding as to how it’s different in order to put off a determined Islamic proselytiser, without falling back on methods that may invite a playing of the race card or some other cry-bully behaviour that strikes fear into the heart of the naive and/or politically correct secularist.


  2. embolden says:

    Thanks Alan, I’m currently reading “the way of the strangers” and, apart from a few jarring (to me) linguistic Americanisms it is a very well researched, interesting piece of work that is highly readable.

    It chimes with conversations I have had in the Arab world…..and I only worked in a civilian setting with members of the professional class, (not “the Arab street”) many of the views expressed in the book are mainstream interpretations of Islamic teaching.

    I met people who were active in travelling to Afghanistan to support the Afghan mujahideen against the USSR and just average people who were happy to talk about support for and participation in armed jihad in Bosnia (this was the 1990s) the history of the Crusades as if it was yesterday and the coming triumph of Islam. I had people try to convert me and attract me by playing on manifestations of the wests declining power and influence, compromised moral order and acceptance of Muslim ways in the west.

    Since returning to the UK I have watched, aghast as the west has been led by sleepwalking or bought off politicians and mass media into a submissive and appeasing position with regard to Islam and can only hope that the “way of the strangers” is widely read, it needs to be.
    Forewarned is forearmed.


    • embolden says:

      Due to my fat fingers I’ve just self reported my own post!


      • chrisH says:

        I too have done this embolden.
        I twittered loads of hate abuse to myself via Facebook, and sent my details to Mark Zuckenburg so I could be Facebooked-whatever than means, I deserve it!
        It may well be a cry for help and attention though embolden-and fat -shaming your fingers is probably deserving of your own self hatred.
        Not self abuse though eh?…that turns you into a BBC lefty , so I understand.


    • Grant says:


      David Pryce-Jones ” The Closed Circle. An Interpretation of the Arabs “, is a good introduction to these psychopaths without being too technical.


  3. NCBBC says:

    Pres Trump has stated that he intends to destroy ISIS. He intends to form an alliance with Russia to achieve this.

    So why is the left so concerned? Surely they are not sympathetic to ISIS. Yes and no. The left and Muslims know that there is no such thing as moderate Islam. ISIS is the genuine Islam. Therefore Pres Trump’s goal is the elimination of Islam as a political force. As the left uses this political force, it cannot but oppose the attack on ISIS.