A Biased BBC reader writes;

“The BBC has gone all Buzzfeed: https://www.facebook.com/bbcthree/videos/10154389975545787/

Foreigners and refugees are intelligent, articulate and amazing individuals, answering strawman questions posted by (fictional?) ignorant, idiotic and bigoted indigenous Brits. To emphasise the message thet Brits are inferior, the tone from the interviewees ranges from mildly humorous to condescension to arrogance to ungratefulness to even nastiness.  In fact, the sneering sarcasm towards us putrid plebs is so spot on I expect the BBC will offer them all a job as a Beeb journalist…. ”

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someone
Bookmark the permalink.


  1. TPO says:

    At the end of the video clip are the names of those who clearly think that we should be on bended knee to thank them that they have given us the honour of paying for them, because after all they are all astrophysicists or neurosurgeons.

    Bisi Alimi
    Meltem Avcil
    Farasat Ahmed
    Rehab Jameelrah
    Guwali Passarlay
    Amina Kadogo
    Mohammed Ali
    Shahd Abusalama

    Crude BBC propaganda at best, doubtless written and produced by the myriad of economic migrants that the BBC has chosen to employ.


    • Guest Who says:

      Maybe they could borrow that guy’s guide dog to record all the offensive stuff they may have missed when talking to the BBC about being offended?


  2. TPO says:

    When the BBC allowed this nonsense to be produced and aired they could have included this lovely individual to share with everyone his view of how awful the British are:

    A convicted murderer from Holland was able to walk through Britain’s porous borders without any checks and went on to attack two police officers with a claw-hammer.
    “Afghan-born Jamshid Piruz was allowed to enter the UK unchallenged despite being sentenced to 12 years in jail for slaughtering his female tenant in cold-blood after watching a Taliban beheading video.
    Piruz, who was a permanent Dutch resident, will be sentenced on Friday after pleading guilty to an appalling hammer attack on PC Jessica Chick and PC Stewart Young, of Sussex Police, on January 7 last year.
    Piruz had been in the UK a matter of days when he launched the frenzied assault on the officers as they investigated a burglary in Crawley, West Sussex.
    Days earlier he had assaulted a member of staff at Gatwick Airport – but was released onto the streets by local magistrates.


    The priceless bit is the defence shyster’s mitigation speech, someone who clearly has, at some time been heavily influenced by the BBC:

    “Simon Blackford, defending, said there was a ‘long gap’ between the murder and the latest offences.
    He said: ‘This offence was committed at a time of stress for my client. He was in a foreign country. He seems to have been vulnerable. He seems to have been hallucinating.
    He was very confused by the vehicles driving on a different side of the road than he was used to.”

    “A long gap between the murder and taking a hammer to police”! Well seven of those eight years he was behind bars. One year out and he’s trying to bash people’s brains out.

    Ever since moving to Canada some nine years ago I’ve been really confused by people driving on the ‘wrong’ side of the road. I fancy getting my lump hammer and sashaying down to the local mosque to introduce myself.


    • Lobster says:

      No doubt the fact that the Dutch have yellow number plates on the front of their vehicles added to his confusion.


  3. Lucy Pevensey says:

    Are these people on drugs? Are we going to find out that all the socialists & liberals have been part of a diabolical government experiment or something?


    • Up2snuff says:

      Lucy, I would not be surprised if some of this down to the accumulated effect of soft drugs and alcohol. Not the defendant, as far as I know.

      But I suspect the defence lawyer may have suffered some brain damage from previous consumption.


  4. Edward says:

    It’s all our fault, guys. Come on – let’s face facts. We are the scum of the Earth. Take this for example: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/disability-38027203


    • All Lives Matter says:

      Funny how the BBC has no interest in the poor disabled man who was kidnapped and beaten by racist thugs in Chicago. Why? Because the victim was white and the perpetrators were black. They also claimed he supported Trump, without evidence of course, but this alone is enough for the sick-minded BBC fascists to think that the perpetrators are actually just victims of structural racism and the real victim is collateral damage in pursuit of the socialist cause.


      • Amounderness Lad says:

        Ah, but the police there are giving grave consideration to the possibility that the incident might be a Hate Crime. Maybe I’m cynical but I read that as that they are searching frantically for some excuse, however feeble, to present it as anything but a hate crime.

        Meanwhile, on Radio Scotland at midday, they seemed more concerned that it had been streamed live on Facebook for quite a length of time.

        In effect the bBBC were busily trying to transfer people’s disgust onto Facebook, as part of their current fanatical hatred aimed at discrediting the social media, rather than the animals committing the unspeakable crime.


    • Up2snuff says:

      Edward, what is really interesting about that is that the article mentions twice or three times that he is a doctor. Where Amit Patel’s medical condition is explained, in the same article, it states he did not complete medical school, let alone qualify as a doctor.

      Accidental or deliberate misinformation by the BBC?

      Secondly, I seem to remember the BBC relatively recently relaying to me information about how helpful Londoners are to people in trouble or some need, I think from one of those famous ‘studies somewhere’. In addition, the Standard and Metro newspapers carry daily ‘thank yous’ from people who have been in exactly those situations.

      I am left wondering again, accidental or deliberate misinformation by the BBC?

      Poor reporting and editing or deliberate propagandising under cover of a journalistic article?


      • johnnythefish says:

        U2S – convenient, coincidental reporting that supports the ‘Britain has become a nation of racists since Brexit’ agenda.


        • Grant says:


          I wish the BBC would tell us which country is less racist than Britain !


    • G.W.F. says:

      I am sure it can be traced to the effects of climate change


    • johnnythefish says:

      Patel says he had assumed, as a doctor, he would know where to get support, but he found that wasn’t the case and he became frustrated at the simple mistakes he made – miscalculations led to stair falls and fingers were burnt from trying to find out how full his coffee cup was.

      Whilst his wife was doing what, precisely? Wtf does he want, a PA on the NHS?


  5. boohanna says:


    High intent then…..


  6. vesnadog says:

    I can’t remember if the following report about the BBC being awash with homosexuals has been downloaded to this website so I thought I would remind ourselves how cowardly the BBC’s elites really are:

    “BBC executives admitted the corporation is dominated by homosexuals. They acknowledged that ethnic minorities held a disproportionate number of positions and said the BBC deliberately encourages multiculturalism and is more careful to avoid offending the Muslim community than Christians”.


    The sooner the BBC is given its marching orders [by the licence payers] the better for every one!


  7. Broadcasting-on-Behalf-of-the-Caliphate says:

    Thank you David and thank you TPO and others for all this additional important information.

    If it wasn’t already clear, it must be clear now with this additional information that the BBC is riven to the core with anti-British and anti-English hostile elements. They clearly view the indigenous British and the indigenous English as the enemy.

    It seems to me the situation with the BBC is as critically bad today as the Libyan Embassy in London was back in 1984. I fear the only option now available to us for its recovery is to send in the SAS to purge it of these self-declared enemies of the British people.

    In the absence of the SAS (no doubt run down by successive governments) there needs to be a campaign of not paying for the BBC license – as the BBC is clearly no longer fit for purpose.


    • Broadcasting-on-Behalf-of-the-Caliphate says:

      Sorry – I got my history muddled. I meant the BBC is as bad today as the Iranian Embassy in London was in 1980 – when Margaret Thatcher sent in the SAS to sort them out. Anyway me talking about embassies is a distraction to the point I was trying to make:

      Just send in the SAS to clear up the BBC or failing that refuse to pay your license until the BBC is restored to the British.


  8. EUTV says:

    Can you name an industry not affected by wage depression and the free movement of people?

    I can. It’s broadcasting and includes the BBC.

    You need a certain kind of degree and you have to speak English. It’s a shame we dob’t open the market up.


  9. EUTV says:

    Can you name an industry not affected by wage depression and the free movement of people?

    I can. It’s broadcasting and includes the BBC.

    You need a certain kind of degree and you have to speak English. It’s a shame we don’t open the market up.