I’m sure you will have read that the Toulouse terrorist, Mohammed Merah, has finally met with justice. And a good thing too! However why does the BBC website report keep repeating this…
“He had said he was acting to “avenge Palestinian children” and protest against French military interventions overseas.”
Ok, I do understand that other odd people, like Baroness Ashton, shared (to a degree) his perverse world view of what is allegedly happening to the “Palestinian children” but why do we REALLY need to read about the motivation of this grotesque Jihad assassin so upfront in the article? Is there the suggestion that those like the BBC who oppose a/ Military invention overseas and b/Israel are happy to flag up Merah’s madness up as a badge of honour, almost?