HAND IN HAND…!

Biased BBC’s Alan asks;


“Is it possible thatthe BBC and the Labour Party are working hand in glove to attack the Coalitiongovernment?

Not just a chance meeting of minds and interests but a deliberately engineeredcampaign to bring down a government? 


Take the recent revelations by the BBC about Ed Lester’s payarrangements….why was he targeted?

We know the BBC has an intense interest in student loans having followed andbroadcast the student protests religiously and at great length.

Is it likely they chose Ed Lester deliberately precisely because he was runningan organisation that was part of a scheme that the BBC disagrees with andtherefore any bad news will damage that scheme?

Just how did they come to decide he was a target? Did they get a tip off froman interested party….a Labour member?

It is interesting how quick off the ball Labour were in demanding an ‘urgentquestion’ in Parliament.

Reminds me of the recent time when a charity published a report timed tocoincide with and support Labour questions.

Is the BBC co-ordinating with Labour?

Disappointing how political Margaret Hodge was on the radio today talking aboutthis….although the Public Accounts Committee was going to investigate thismatter it seemed she had already made up her mind of great wrong doings, andthe trail of guilt lead all the way to the top…government ministers areimplicated in this crime against the ‘people’.

Shame the BBC failed to tell us she was ‘Labour’ and had sponsored the 2004Higher Education Act which introduced tuition fees for students….wonder ifshe had any insider knowledge?”

Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to HAND IN HAND…!

  1. fred bloggs says:

    Two days ago, I wrote an entry on open thread that was on almost identical lines.  I did not list any particular broadcast as it seemed almost every programme showed some bias.  I do not beleive it is my paranoia, there is a concerted offensive going on at the moment.

       0 likes

  2. Span Ows says:

    I think it is patently clear that the BBC and the Guardian work hand in hand and both are currently marching to the Labour drum. I doubt even Scott and others can deny this with any real conviction. I think there must be bunks laid on in BBC studios for the labour talking heads whom are NEVER off the air!

       0 likes

  3. cjhartnett says:

    Hand in hand?
    Consummated civil partnership I`d say-with Giles Fraser giving his blessing.
    Luckily their inbred spawn goad each other into the ditch…so we don`t need to listen.
    And one day-we won`t need to pay.
    Let Uncles Vladimir or Abu stump up for theses two screaming queens of culture.
    Time to ditch these bitches!

       0 likes

  4. David Preiser (USA) says:

    Reflexive lapdogs more than actual collaborators, I think. Some Labourite got in touch with one of the News Beeboids and presto, a story. I’m sure all political parties have the same ability to contact key Beeboids who control the news agenda, but the pattern seems to show a marked trend in reaction on one side.

       1 likes

  5. Jeremy Clarke says:

    O/T.

    I am intrigued by this “Biased BBC contributor Alan” gentleman.

    Who is he? Is he part of a shady anti-BBC cabal operating in shady shadows of the shadowy Biased BBC office? Is he a shadowy figure controlling shady David Vance and his shady shadow-dwelling cohorts? 🙂

       1 likes

    • David Vance says:

      He’s part of the vast right wing anti BBC conspiracy…. =-O

         1 likes

      • Jeremy Clarke says:

        He’s part of the vast right wing anti BBC conspiracy…. 

        Heh, thought so!

        Or don’t you mean the vast shadowy right-wing anti-BBC conspiracy?

           1 likes

  6. Alex says:

    I seem to have heard a lot of BBC radio talking heads using a line such as “There has been a lot of talk recently about <insert Labour sound bit of the week here>”.

    Just thought I’d mention it.

       1 likes

  7. DJ says:

    Hmmmm…. so the hypothesis is that the BBC has entered into a bizarre folie a deux with the left?

    You say that like it’s a bad thing.

    The more time these guys spend in the bunker, the more likely we are to get more ‘Raymond’-style sob stories about how tough it is trying to raise a family on a greater after-tax income than the average junior doctor or police inspector.

       1 likes