WHITEWASH!

As expected, the Muir Russell report into Climategate is a complete, farcical whitewash. People who know far more about the issues involved are still digesting the horror of it all, but it’s already clear, here, here and here, that Sir Muir and his cronies from the scientific establishment grotesquely misrepresented or ignored the key points made by sceptics. The BBC of course, is in a completely different groove. To Richard Black, the headline is straightforward – vinidcation. The sceptics are nutters.

I will post more when the dust settles, but prepare for an evening of the sounds of BBC reporters applying that white paint. Meanwhile, James Delingpole carries on reporting the full horror of what Black and his cohorts are supporting: the spending of £50bn a year of our money on lunatic climate change schemes. I weep.

Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to WHITEWASH!

  1. Cassandra King says:

    Hey its only money isnt it? It grows on trees and the money fairy drops in big wads as she flies around on sliken wings, when money runs out just whistle and the money fairy rescues it from the dark evil forces of darkness in their evil citadel called capitalistiana.

    Fifty billion on ecofairy land and fifty billion on quango land and pretty soon you are taliking real money so why not take it from those evil wealth creators eh? Its not like they sweated blood to earn it is it? Well maybe they did but as we all know wealth creators are selfish and evil and their money belongs not to them but to those who choose not to earn it, its called fairness innit?

    Lies on lies and fraud built on fraud and served by self interest and ignorance and the BBC are are there like a rat up a drainpipe, no stalling and waiting or examining in detail for the BBC, no siree Bob! The BBC script clearing the CRU was written before the result of the inquiry was even known. Now why would the BBC know the results beforehand? Oh yes because the results were known in detail before the whitewash even sat down, the stitch up and the rigged panel of stooges and the limiting of scope and the exclusion of the people that brought the scandal to the world.
    How can they investigate the scandal by ignoring the people who highlighted it all? Its like having a trial but without the prosecution present or allowed to call witnesses. Can you imagine a murder trial where the judge is the defendents Mum and the jury is the defendents family and the defending council is the families father, Judge says to defendent ‘did you murder this person? and the defendent says ‘er no! Oooh well case closed says the judge. I mean FFS.
    But the very best part is played by the BBC as usual, unable to comprehend the irony the BBC ignored the CRU email scandal for days on end citing legal difficulties and that they were trying to investigate the whole story but now its oooh so different isnt it? When the stooge rigged whitewash comes out the BBC are there within seconds with a full and determined vindication of everyone involved, see the difference here? When the BBC saw a story that damaged their precious narrative they sat on the story for days and days while the bastards rigged up a slapdash cover story but when they have a rigged vindication to pimp they are in like Flint no hesitation and no time for investigation.

    THE BBC: WE LIE AND WE CHEAT BECAUSE WE THATS WHAT WE ARE ARE, LIARS AND CHEATS.

    One day the whole BBC pack of cards will come tumbling down, I pray to the heavens that I am still around to witness it, a more dishonest bunch of sh*ts never had their cuppumance so well deserved.

       0 likes

  2. Mailman says:

    Fairly balanced newsnight item tonight. I guess Al Beeb is trying something new aye?

    ALTHOUGH they still managed to f8ck up climate audits URL (listed it as ClimateAudit.com instead of climateaudit.org!).

    Useless feckers.

    Mailman

       0 likes

    • Paul says:

      Lord Lawson did a good job as the lone voice of sanity against the beardy eco-loon who’s always saying “the science is unquestionable” and the ex-UN guy, Yve de Boer, who’s now taken up a lucrative job with KPMG as an “adviser on climate and sustainability” (ie. Advising subsidy farmers how best to profit from the system he set up).

         0 likes

    • Guest Who says:

      Priceless. And for everything else there are… House Rules.

      Here’s a Newsnight thread in complement:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/susanwatts/2010/07/climategate_scientists_honest.html

      Actually, as a piece, also trying to steer a fairly objective path. But try and pursue further some areas of interest raised, and…

      ‘Postings to BBC blogs will be removed if they appear to be potentially defamatory.’

       ‘appears to be potentially…’ is a masterpiece of catch-all vagueness upon which to try to comply with such an invitation.

      But a darned nifty way to ‘move on’.

         0 likes

  3. John Anderson says:

    The whole global warming argument is that there is UNPRECEDENTED warming.  All summarised in the infamous Hockey Stick, which eliminated entirely the Medieval Warming Period.

    This is the second page of today’s article by The Register.  It shows the Hockey Stick – but first it shows a graph that the founder of the CRU produced back in 1980,  showing vividly the Medieval Warming Period.  The poor old guy must be ashamed of what Jones, Briffa et al have done to science.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/07/muir_russell_climategate_report/page2.html

    The wheels are coming off the wagon.  No amount of whitewash can hide the lies.

       0 likes