Latest piece of eco-wackery being disseminated by Al Beeb is that the functioning of the Earth’s forests “could” be lost because of climate change! Key word is “could” – read the article and count how often it is used. This sensationalist scare-mongering is all part of a relentless BBC driven process of brain-washing the population into swallowing all these AGW tripe.
SEEING THE WOODS FOR THE TREES
Bookmark the permalink.
I don’t think anyone takes much notice of this crap from the BBC to be honest. In fact I don’t think people take much notice of the BBC at all.
We just need to make sure that in the general election campaign every time a Tory is interviewed we bring up BBC bias and demand that they scrap the TV tax.
Martin, to an extent that is correct. As people are beginnng to understand that BBC pumps out many untruths and leftist propaganda they are taking to the blogs.
However there are still many millions who really only take their news from the BBC, such is its all poweful reach across national and local broadcasting.
One thing’s for sure: if we get rid of all the carbon dioxide, the trees won’t last long!
Well the earth’s forests are disappearing, that is not really in doubt. I don’t believe it has much to do with global warming though – it is man that is hacking down the forests for land and for the wood. Whether that is good or bad is open for debate. Human progress naturally requires some environmental destruction. As the dominant species, we are doing what humans have always done – taken advantage of our natural resources. There does need to be close attention to this all though – if deforestation continues, and gets far worse, then there could be problems down the road.
Ref the BBC’s 2nd favourite religion – Man Made Global Warming. ( I think we all know the 1st).
Got to:
http://icecap.us/index.php
April 16, 2009
Monckton Testimony Before US House Committee
Download, read and forward the pdf of Monckton’s testimony detailing the falsehoods and fallacies of the MMGW scare. The Big Con is falling apart and I for one would be happy if the BBC fell apart with it.
nrg: True, that tends to be older people who still trust the BBC.
More and more people have access to other news networks and the internet.
Blogs will also be very important next year. But we’ve seen the model for how the BBC will report the next election from what we’ve seen in the US election.
Non the less if a Tory is on the BBC email, text or phone in and whatever they are meant to be talking about as them about reform of the BBC and BBC bias.
We just have to hammer it on all the blogs as well.
You can expect the usual BBC subjects to try to pull the wool over peoples eyes, Marr, Robinson, Easton Paxman and so on.
Why does the BBC think we need its opinions on AGW?
If the BBC really did think that AGW is a problem it would stop mass maufacturing products like Casualty, Eastenders and Cash in the Attic. Why expend energy on making such stuff when other manufacturers produce enough of these products already?
Why expend energy on making unwatchable, patronising crap?
EatBenders is basically a 28 minute govt information film, chock full of little messages for the chav masses.
I am amazed our islamic “fellow citizens” even allow pubs in the East End anymore BTW, after all it is now part of the “muslim world” lol.
More to the point,if the BBC believed in AGW it would close down.As it id=s ,the BBC is guilty of crimes towards humanity.
I once thought the BBC was a disseminator of impartial truth, but over the years I have come to understand that it is far from telling the truth, unless you happen to be part of the left wing, on message, pro government, anti believer of the global warming case often put to us until we choke by the organisations such as the BBC.
For example, Dr David Bellemy who disagreed with global warming, was replaced by the ‘on message’ Bill Oddie.
Its an anal, deeply controlling, thoroughly unpleasant, humourless (viz red cock day) crock of shit.
Hmmm…
fact:
CO2 + sunlight = photosynthesis
Beeboid world:
CO2 + sunlight = end of life on earth
How do they get away with this propaganda?
Grimer ponders: “How do they get away with this propaganda?”
Oh, they rely on several generations of viewers and listeners who have had the benefit (!) of a socialist eduction (ie none at all).
“the earth’s forests are disappearing … it is man that is hacking down the forests for land and for the wood. Whether that is good or bad is open for debate. Human progress naturally requires some environmental destruction. As the dominant species, we are doing what humans have always done – taken advantage of our natural resources.”
Possibly the most ignorant and stupid comments= on this site ever.
It looks like the American public (but not yt their political class with snouts in the trough) are waking up to the climate change fraud.
And fraud really is the right word to use. I find when I use the word – people then start to realise that their opinions are being warped by false info. Not by scientific conflict, real debate, but by a concerted attempt to brainwash them for ulterior motives.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/04/023358.php
Fox News in the US gives the US public a chance to avoid all the climate-change brainwashing :
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517035,00.html
I rather doubt whether the BBC will report this story – even though the headlined the story about Wilkins ice shelf. Bias by omission as usual.