PUTIN POWER

. They just love him, don’t they? I refer to Vladimir Putin and the BBC. I was watching the 10 Ten O Clock news and the BBC was slobbering over the communist thug and his all powerful command of what is happening in Georgia. Then we were presented with the revelation that only the French diplomats can save the day! My god, what next – the Belgium army to act as peace-keepers? Of course what REALLY concerns me is that the curious lack of street demos from the “anti-war peace activists” who infested our streets when we toppled the butcher of Baghdad. But now Putin is using power to bully and crush..ssssshhhh, say nothing and the BBC will ask no tricky questions. Now, back to the Olympics and leave the French to sort it all out… just another rainy night in Georgia.

Bookmark the permalink.

156 Responses to PUTIN POWER

  1. Ivan3 says:

    Dear fluffy

    John Bull:

    1) Still no luck with the MI5 poison dart killers roaming London during the cold war…have you tried Google?

    2) “You cannot get around the fact that the international court has no jurisdiction to try the US for genocide. You are trying to pick comments here and there and apply them as legal precedents, but none of the cases you cite relate to treaties ratified with reservations.”
    You are completely, totally, wrong about this. Obviously you have difficulty in understanding. Then again you are thick. We’ll try again; v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y…do try to keep up. The Supreme Court has ruled that the ICJ cannot over rule DOMESTIC law; interestedly ICJ rulings have never been used to overrule domestic law ANYWERE. But genocide is illegal under US law so the ICJ ruling about it would be enforced domestically.

    What the ruling means is that it explicitly lays out the constitutional law regarding International Treaties., and made the point obviously, is that the President has signed an INTERANTIONAL treaty, and the Congress has empowered the President (automatically when the president is made president), whoever the President may be with the power to sign and be politically RESPNONSIBLE to the ICJ/UN for these international treaties. If any country, Russia (pure chance) committed genocide in another, say Belgium, they would be tried by the ICJ court…the same would apply to the US. These international treaties, see previous posts, cannot be changed by congress, the US is signed to the total UN genocide convention, and they have no opt-outs, see previous posts, they cannot have opt-outs. The Ruling proves that ICJ rulings are supreme internationally, that the US can be held to account by the ICJ for US actions. The Supreme Court Ruling has enshrined the supreme nature of International treaties in US Constitutional law….the argument is over period.

    It doesn’t matter what a philosopher said twenty years ago, or what a lawyer wrote 17 years ago (though you do not understand Le Blanc’s point, no doubt because it did not agree with your bigotry) the face is that the highest court in the US has enshrined the responsibilities of the US internationally to the ICJ/UN in US law.

    Now let’s look at things clearly.
    1) The Genocide convention is signed by the US. • check.
    2) It needs to be ratified by the US Congress • it was.
    3) That congress cannot alter the UN treaty in any respect, see previous posts • correct.
    4) The UN genocide convention needs to become part of US domestic law • it was, with stronger punishment than the UN -yup genocide is illegal under domestic US law.
    5) That the UN Charter requires that genocide suspects have to be extradited to face justice in UN mandated courts • the US does extradite genocide suspects, even US citizens to face trial at ICJ courts • again like the UN convention states. The US has never refused a genocide extradition to a UN court. So that’s OK.
    6) The US is offering millions of $ in rewards trying to find UN wanted genocide suspects in the US, even though that is not in the UN convention • yes.
    7) That the US president is responsible to the UN and the ICJ for its INTERNATIONAL TREATIES for US actions, in this case any acts of genocide • yes indeedey. Indeed the people who control the US Constitution have made a ruling, see previous post; a LEGALLY BINDING RULING that this is the case….this is US constitutional law. THAT THE US IS ANSWERABLE TO THE ICJ/UN FOR ANY CRIMES OF GENOCIDE. There are no ifs or buts here. The President or the Congress cannot refuse to comply as the US is obligated to its international treaties.

    Now let us return to your original ridiculous contention – Genocide is LEGAL in the US… it is not, obviously, it is illegal under domestic law, it is illegal under international law, and that the US, through its President is answerable to the ICJ/UN for any accusations of genocide. You are totally wrong in your pathetic views on the US regarding genocide.

    Bigotry is not nice. When it blinds you to what is written in legible English then the fault is yours…..lets face it you’ve lost the argument, every ridiculous statement has been proven wrong… when EVERY up-to-date expert in US and international law says something accept it. Just because you want, wish, hope, dream, it to be true, doesn’t make it so…. Now be an adult and accept the truth.

    Talking about ICJ/ECHR rulings… do you accept the rulings against Russia re: Georgia? It is very strange you don’t mention the cases Russia has lost. I mean if you agree with the ICJ/ECHR judgments it follows that you must condemn Russia for its illegality (proved in court) and call for speedy and just justice for the guilty….. Don’t you???

    “and stop catching at straws • hopefully then you will drown.”
    Surely that is not a threat? That would be very naughty… and illegal, you really don’t want to go down that route petal.

       0 likes

  2. Albert the Cat says:

    Ivan3 – why are you bothering with this guy?

       0 likes

  3. John Bull says:

    “Ivan3 – why are you bothering with this guy?
    Albert the Cat | 21.08.08 – 12:13 am”

    Because he has OCD – obsessive co*kbrain disorder.

    “If any country, Russia (pure chance) committed genocide in another, say Belgium, they would be tried by the ICJ court…the same would apply to the US”

    Why do you babble? Russia withdrew its reservation to article IX. The US did not. You have demonstrated nothing in your babbling, except that you avoid the issue, and the recent world court judgement citing article IX when Serbia tried to take NATO to the ICJ.

    “Talking about ICJ/ECHR rulings… do you accept the rulings against Russia re: Georgia?”

    I’m not aware of them. Do you accept rulings against British security services for failing to investigate their collusion in the murder of innocent people in Northern Ireland? – sounds more like the Russian authorities to me – but at least they are corrupt.

    “Still no luck with the MI5 poison dart killers roaming London during the cold war…have you tried Google?”

    Shut up about what I didn’t find and go to Wikipedia, undo your dishonest edits, then flush your head down the toilet.

       0 likes

  4. Ivan3 says:

    Fluffy,
    John Bull:
    “Ivan3 – why are you bothering with this guy?
    Albert the Cat | 21.08.08 – 12:13 am”

    “Because he has OCD – obsessive co*kbrain disorder.”
    That is very mature, I mean if anyone has Obsessive-compulsive disorder, then it’s you… It is not normal to have an irrational love of a dictator who orders murder or war crimes… this is not normal. Insulting people with mental health ‘issues’ is quite normal with people who have mental health problems of their own.

    “Why do you babble? Russia withdrew its reservation to article IX. The US did not. You have demonstrated nothing in your babbling, except that you avoid the issue, and the recent world court judgment citing article IX when Serbia tried to take NATO to the ICJ.”
    They tried saying that genocide and ethnic cleansing within Serbia was beyond ICJ jurisdiction… it wasn’t. being retarded I know you cannot understand what is clearly and simply written, see previous posts which PROVE you’re a wrong and lying… as to Serbia and recent…. Eighteen years isn’t recent even by your own very low standard this latest diversion of your is spectacularly idiotic.
    “I’m not aware of them.”
    Then read the previous posts which gave copies of the judgments, and links to official sites…. You really should read more not wanting to understand or read things which shatter your pathetic little world view were fascism is good, does not make wrong…. Reality is true… you are wrong…

    “Do you accept rulings against British security services for failing to investigate their collusion in the murder of innocent people in Northern Ireland?”
    What “rulings” from the ECHR are you talking about?

    “sounds more like the Russian authorities to me – but at least they are corrupt.”
    Are you saying Russian authorities are corrupt?? They are, but it would be a first for you to criticize your beloved Russia.

    “Still no luck with the MI5 poison dart killers roaming London during the cold war…have you tried Google?”

    “Shut up about what I didn’t find”

    So that is a no then!!!!!
    The thing is that the more you lie about it the more a fool you appear to everyone else.

    But seriously, we are all adults here, we are here to support you in your struggle… you don’t seem to be very happy, you know obsessed with genocide, supporting Russian crimes, constant lying, the total inability to deal with reality, incapable of understanding the simplest thing that challenges your perverted world view… this is not normal. We only want to help you. Would you like a contact so you can discuss your problems in a confidential, supportive environment? Or is it irrational rage due to some sexual dysfunction… again we can provide you with confidential medical advice. Medicine has moved on, there are, according to the medical experts’ treatments and tablets that may help you in your ‘problem’. Or is your fascist obsession due to sexual confusion. I mean I could not help noticing you have an obsession with aggressive men in uniform, and fascist armies do have some attraction to a certain element in the gay community. I could not fail to notice you mention how straight you are for no reason, not a thing a person who is happy and secure with their sexuality does…. Classic examples of sexual confusion… I’m sure the people here have the breadth of training, and experience to provide you with the serious help you need… you’d be happier, healthier, and your family less likely to need you to be sectioned… we only want the best.

       0 likes

  5. Ivan3 says:

    “Albert the Cat:
    Ivan3 – why are you bothering with this guy?
    Albert the Cat | 21.08.08 – 12:13 am | # ”

    To tell the truth it began when they started lying…. That is irritating, especially when they are supporting murder and war crimes. It was then funny, I mean you cannot take this ridiculous person seriously… they do taken themselves seriously, which is a joke. It is not normal to deny the truth when shown facts. As for denying Russian murders and war crimes when faced with independent evidence is horrific. It raises the specter of the rise of fascism in the ‘30’s.

    He is a sad and pathetic little idiot who, as with most of these cowardly fascists, will end up alone, unwashed, and unloved… I mean all jokes, and they are nothing if not a joke.. gets old after a while.

    The more his pathetic, shallow, irrational, diatribe has goes on the more pathetic, they have become. It is like seeing the man in the street disintegrating as whatever mental capacity he had dissolves due to the demons that posses him.

    Bull is just a sad loser…. The joke defiantly ceased to be funny.

       0 likes

  6. John Bull says:

    No, Serbia brought NATO to the ICJ. I’m not talking about Serbia being brought to the ICJ, which is why I didn’t mention that, and hence you show symptoms of retardation.

    “What “rulings” from the ECHR are you talking about?”

    What rulings are you talking about? I think what is being said here is “find them yourself if you care”.

    “Are you saying Russian authorities are corrupt??”

    Muah ha ha. The west was happy with the corruption when the fraudsters they are friends with now were getting state assets and fraudulently stealing money. Of course I acknowledged corruption above in relation to the Litvinenko polonium 210 point, but you forgot that.

    So, I take it from your ramblings about mental health and your knowledge of sexual dysfunction (strange that you are so well versed in the area) that you have given up on your lame genocide argument, and will forthwith remove your dishonest, lowlife Wikipedia edits to the John Stalker page. Good evening to you, scumsucker.

       0 likes