Reach for the garlic; the vampires of the BBC are killing current affairs

, writes Tom Mangold in Wednesday’s Independent. Formerly a senior BBC News correspondent and longstanding journalist on Panorama, I’ve always thought of Mangold as one of the better old-school guys at the BBC. Here are a couple of excerpts, laying in to the ratings chasing dolts that run the BBC nowadays:

What you are not seeing on Panorama generally are reporters of reputation, chutzpah and experience telling you what the hell Iran is up to; what on earth is going on at the CIA; whether the Labour Party really is sawing at its own throat with rusty razor-blades; how Israel and Hamas intend to co-exist; just who is the 17-year-old wunderkind chosen for England’s World Cup squad; how much longer can the Iraq imbroglio last before meltdown; and can anyone anywhere explain why our boys are in Afghanistan?

The appointment of a new editor will be BBC1’s last chance to salvage the wreckage of its current affairs commitment. One more mistake and surely the game will be up. But the omens are not good. My former boss Mark Thompson in his BBC “state of the union” message devoted exactly eight words out of 4,000 – that’s 0.2 per cent – to the subject of BBC TV current affairs. Here’s what he said: “[We are going to] find new ways of shaping our current affairs.” That’s it. Mind-blowing stuff, eh? Big commitment by Britain’s boss of public service broadcasting.

and:

Peter Fincham also promised his demoralised staff “hour-long, week-night special editions at 9pm”. Oh yeah? So what happened last Wednesday? A Panorama “special” (on yet another poor person close to death) was first kicked out of its usual Sunday night slot because it got in the way of a major feature film; next the producer was told he could have a slot on Wednesday but would he cut 10 minutes out of the film first. (Imagine Van Gogh’s agent: “Too many sunflowers there, Van old boy, take a few out, big canvases don’t sell any more.”) Then, what was left of the film was not run, as promised, at 9pm, but the truncated version appeared at 7pm (reaching a dismally small audience of 2.3 million). Why? Well, BBC2 was running The Apprentice at 9pm, ITV had the Uefa Cup Final, and Fincham could only fight back with a blockbuster film starting at 9pm. That’s the commitment to current affairs now on the channel. Cinderella was treated like Madonna in comparison.

Indeed. Lowest common denominator ratings chasing with ITV and Sky isn’t my idea of public service television either. I fondly recall, from the age of about 12 upwards, being increasingly interested, informed and piqued by BBC programmes like Panorama and ITV programmes like World in Action, TV Eye (This Week) and First Tuesday – the first of which is often but a shadow of its former self, whilst the latter are long since finished on ITV (pleasingly though, the news junkies among us can get classic World in Action programmes on DVD now – it’s worth it just for the nostalgia trip of the theme music, let alone film of things like Idi Amin on his rise to infamy. Do stop me if I ever start to reminisce about Richard Stilgoe’s piano playing on Nationwide though!).

Channel 4’s contribution to this area of TV is much appreciated. Series like Dispatches and one-offs by independent minded people of varying political hues (for instance Peter Oborne, William Shawcross, Martin Bell, Rod Liddle, Kenan Malik etc.) are to be commended, but there is so much more current affairs coverage that could and should be done, in particular by the BBC.

There are exceptions to this state of affairs at the BBC: Andrew Neil’s resurgence is a welcome nod in the direction of no nonsense inquisition (though Diane Abbott and Michael Portillo could do with a change now and again). Even Jeremy Paxman, and, to a lesser degree, Newsnight as a whole, have gone up in my estimation in recent times. Their section the other day on illegal immigration, including a packaged report by Steve Moxon, the IND whistleblower, and a studio discussion with Sir Andrew Green and Nick Clegg was very good – although Tony McNulty, the Labour minister could have done with a thorough mauling, including Green and Clegg, rather than being dealt with separately. If only Newsnight (and the BBC) could lose the awful (and thoroughly compromised) Kirsty Nark and ditch the right-on twaddle that masquerades as Newsnight Review.

There is still a place, a market and a need for decent, probing, investigative current affairs reporting in the UK. If the BBC could free itself from its prevailing anodine, politically correct pap, peddled by its self-selecting gang of Guardian subscribing drones (and the overpaid smiley, smiley ‘talent’ lounging on the corporation’s sofas) then we might get back to having decent current affairs programming that actually informs and serves the British public – the people who pay for it all – rather than pushing the right-on agenda of the Guardian’s metropolitan chattering classes.

Update: According to the Guardian Panorama jobs under threat, including, they speculate, John Ware:

Ware has produced some of Panorama’s biggest scoops over recent years, including the Who Bombed Omagh? special in which he named the Real IRA men thought to be responsible.

His loss would be a big blow to the corporation, which has repeatedly pledged not to downgrade its commitment to current affairs.

“There is a very small reporting pool within the current affairs area that is well and truly under threat,” said a source.

“They are all of a certain age and are investigative reporters who do what they do very well but can’t be fitted into other roles very easily. Ware is in a very vulnerable group.”

John Ware is another of the good guys at the BBC – if they’re stupid enough to get rid of reporters like him then they might as well axe Panorama in favour of more derivative crap like Lame Academy – paid for by voluntary subscription.

Hat tip to Ritter for The Independent link and dumbcisco for the Guardian link.

Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Reach for the garlic; the vampires of the BBC are killing current affairs

  1. Jonathan Boyd Hunt says:

    Well the BBC could begin with this story – and Jane Corbin has a head start.

    http://www.guardianlies.com/Pegs%20that%20stood%20up/page2.html

       0 likes

  2. dumbcisco says:

    Andrew

    Excellent summary of the strengths and weaknesses of BBC TV.

    But the weaknesses of BBC journalism are greatly compounded when you throw in the “agenda-setting” Today prog on R4, and Mair’s bias at PM. Plus of course the Dreadful Dimblebys.

       0 likes

  3. Grimer says:

    I remember watching Panorama with my family when I was growing up. Very informative and interesting. What has happened to it?

    As the article states, Despacthes is the only decent Current Affairs programme on TV these days.

    If the BBC can’t even produce in depth reports on important World/UK events/stories, just what is the point in the BBC?

       0 likes

  4. Andrew says:

    dumbcisco: “Excellent summary of the strengths and weaknesses of BBC TV”

    except this isn’t Laban’s post – it’s one of mine… shall I amend your comment for you?

       0 likes

  5. dumbcisco says:

    Andrew

    Sorry – after I read the piece I scrolled up to see who wrote it – and scrolled too fast, too far, up to Laban’s name at the top of the preceding post.

    Yes – please correct my comment.

       0 likes

  6. Paul McLaughlan says:

    I find it hard to stomach the idea that Rod Liddle was “to be commended”. His programme on the “New Fundamentalists” was some of the most extreme propaganda I have seen on TV for some time.

       0 likes

  7. lmo says:

    I hope all of you are going to be listening to Any Questions tonight.Immigration will probably be a top issue hence the bias with the panelists: three for the Left,one for the “Right” and Dimbleby,of course.

       0 likes

  8. dumbcisco says:

    That’s four for the left line on immigration.

    Last night on Question Time the Tory party guy was Ken Clarke. Just to boost the left side. He criticised the government for the chaos on immigration, but seemed entirely relaxed with the current scale of influx.

       0 likes

  9. AntiCitizenOne says:

    dumbcisco,

    I’m not so worried about the scale of immigration, it’s the low quality of immigrant the UK gets from subsidising immigration that’s the real problem.

       0 likes

  10. Andrew says:

    Paul: “I find it hard to stomach the idea that Rod Liddle was “to be commended”. His programme on the “New Fundamentalists” was some of the most extreme propaganda I have seen on TV for some time.

    I didn’t say that I agreed with all of the views expressed – it is the variety of differing views, rather than a pretence at balance, that I find commendable. Same goes for the programmes I mentioned – World in Action was often leftist, but was fairly obviously so – the important point for me was that they were raising and discussing issues, real issues that matter to real British people, which don’t often get a proper airing these days.

    dumbcisco: “Last night on Question Time the Tory party guy was Ken Clarke.”

    I suppose at least we had Freddie Forsyth on to compensate a bit for the wafty wetness of Clarke…

       0 likes

  11. dumbcisco says:

    which left Forsyth as the sole voice from the right. Outnumbered 5 to 1 ?

       0 likes

  12. will says:

    Re Liddle he ends his spectator piece with

    the euphuism and hyperbole of Arab satraps is just that: hyperbole and euphuism. It is not meant to be taken literally.

    Would that extend to Iranians & threats of wiping Israel off the map?

       0 likes

  13. rich says:

    http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=398274b5-9210-43e4-ba59-fa24f4c66ad4&k=28534

    Iran passes law to make Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians wear badges. No word from the BBC though.

       0 likes

  14. MisterMinit says:

    “Iran passes law to make Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians wear badges. No word from the BBC though.”

    Follow up on that story.

       0 likes

  15. Bryan says:

    Yeah, we know, thanks.

    Still no final word on it, though.

       0 likes