Loyal opposition.

BBC Eye is a Beebwatching blog by “Cerdic”, who started the Beebwatch blog before blogs existed. His post for today says:

Five Live Drivel continues to not surprise. In awaiting Charles Kennedy’s statement (no, not ‘mine’s a pint), they said that the Shadow Cabinet was split over his possible departure. Since the Shadow Cabinet is currently Conservative (I know the BBC hopes the LibDums will become the official opposition, but really), I suspect they’re fervently hoping Good Time Charlie stays put. The LibDem Frontbench are another matter entirely. But then, facts and the BBC…..

Bookmark the permalink.

39 Responses to Loyal opposition.

  1. John Tomlinson says:

    Interesting how little prominence this story is currently being given on the BBC News front homepage. Bad news being buried perhaps…?

       0 likes

  2. TomL says:

    The BBC thinks Michael Barrymore is more controversial than George Galloway.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4584056.stm

    “The inclusion of Michael Barrymore is controversial”

    They tell us all about Barrymore, but don’t seem to give us much on Galloway.
    Y’know ‘War on Want,’ Oil-for Food,’ etc.
    Wonder why?

       0 likes

  3. TomL says:

    Is that homophobic?

    🙂

       0 likes

  4. Angie Schultz says:

    The BBC currently has a story titled: “Kennedy admits struggle with drink”. I nearly choked when I read that. In other news, Pope found to be Catholic, Sun rises in east, etc. Then I realized they weren’t talking about Teddy, but some other fellow.

       0 likes

  5. TAoL says:

    O/T.

    The Israeli PM is critically ill and the Palestinian elections take place in four days. The Middle East is facing a crucial and uncertain few weeks.

    And what is the self-appointed leader of the UK’s anti-war movement, the indefatigable campaigner for the Palestinian people and the Arab world, and the man who gives voice to the disenfranchised and angry British Muslims, doing?

    Yes: George Galloway has entered the Big Brother house.

       0 likes

  6. Anonymous says:

    Not the BBC News – World roundup –

    IRAN: HOLOCAUST CONFERENCE SOON IN TEHRAN

    Tehran, 5 Jan. (AKI) – Iran has decided to rewrite and revise the history of the Holocaust.

    IRAN: ISLAM CAN SAVE THE WORLD SAYS HARDLINE PRESIDENT
    Qom, 5 Jan. (AKI) – Iran’s recently elected hardline president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, claimed on Thursday that his government’s number-one objective is to reach beyond national boundaries to reedeem the world in the name of Islam.

    Jerusalem, 23 Dec. (AKI) – As the Vatican and Israel prepare to meet in January in a fresh attempt to resolve a long-standing tax dispute, Jerusalem officials said this week that the Catholic Church owes most of a 65 million dollar debt in unpaid property taxes in the city.

       0 likes

  7. Anonymous says:

    a radical Palestinian leader in Damascus called Sharon’s health crisis a gift from God.

    “We say it frankly that God is great and is able to exact revenge on this butcher. … We thank God for this gift he presented to us on this new year,” Ahmed Jibril, leader of the Syrian-backed faction Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, a small radical group, told the Associated Press.

       0 likes

  8. MisterMinit says:

    Here is an article where the BBC clearly refers to his shadow cabinet rather than the showdow cabinet.

    So if the Beeb did refer to it as the shadow cabinet, what was their motive? What could they possibly achieve by doing that given that everyone knows that it is the Conservatives that make up the opposition in parliament?

    Perhaps the blogger simply misheard what was being said, or the presenter simply mispoke? I can’t see what other conclusions that can be drawn from this that aren’t preconceived.

       0 likes

  9. Socialism is Necrotizing says:

    this is brilliant (see Today Proram)

    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/2006/01/today_fails_aga.html

       0 likes

  10. roy says:

    BOLTON Wanderers were embroiled in a dispute with the BBC last night after Sam Allardyce withdrew from a Radio 5 Live programme in protest at comments made by Alan Green, the station’s controversial commentator

    Oh dear, what’s the fuss about?

    The postbag of yesterday’s Bolton Evening News only highlighted the antipathy within the town towards Green, ….. David Wilson, of Leigh, wrote that Green should “provide an objective and unbiased service to the listener rather than warped opinions

    Where have we heard that said before?

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,281-1972516,00.html

       0 likes

  11. disillusioned_german says:

    Jeez, if that’s not an “evil” picture of Kennedy I don’t know what is:

    Picture

       0 likes

  12. disillusioned_german says:

    Roy: I also think that Big Sam is a whining **** – he’s mastered the art of intimidating the opposition (incl. the refs). I detest their “arse-licking” of Abramovich’s Chels**** as well.

       0 likes

  13. disillusioned_german says:

    That’s the Beeb’s “arse-licking”, of course. Russian bloke come good… etc

       0 likes

  14. dave t says:

    So George Galloway has turned up in the Big Brother House along with the likes of Michael Barrymore and Dennis Rodman. Questions include: is Galloway donating his fee to charity and if so, will he be able to prove it? Will he continue to draw an MP salary whilst sitting around the BB House? How the heck does he think he represents his constituents when he is never in his area?

    Add this to the ‘You canna mak it up’ files…..

       0 likes

  15. Anonymous says:

    Type in black cock in google images..
    goto page 3
    gus smith from eastenders appears under the bbc’s url:

    goto the page and view the source code.
    it cleary states black cock in the source
    it seems as though someone inside the bbc doesnt like gus.

       0 likes

  16. Geoff says:

    this is brilliant (see Today Program)
    http://conservativehome.blogs.co…_fails_aga.html
    Socialism is Necrotizing | 06.01.06 – 1:18 am |

    Nice to know that someone here also reads the stuff we talk about over there 🙂 B-BBC had some good plugs on that thread yesterday and I’m looking forward to reading what’s been said overnight.

       0 likes

  17. Eamonn says:

    As St James of Smug Naughtie mentions (again) that Ariel Sharon is thought of “by some people” as a war criminal, I wondered how many times St James referred to Arafat as a “terrorist”?

       0 likes

  18. Grimer says:

    Does anyboy remember this?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2801955.stm

       0 likes

  19. Ian Barnes says:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4586434.stm

    i feel sorry for Charlie boy.

    Simon Hughes & Co are clearly the cause of most evil..

       0 likes

  20. Ian Barnes says:

    OT

    I’d respect the BBC even more if they covered stories like this:

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1972459,00.html

       0 likes

  21. Rob Read says:

    Cockney,

    The BBC doesn’t mention that this is being treated as a murder enquiry.

    It also would be nice if they included contact details for Detective Chief Inspector Steve Strong.

    I hope they catch the scum who did this. I’m pessimistic that justice will be done when a judge sentences.

       0 likes

  22. Susan says:

    Good heavens, a geezer of 95 and he still put up a fight! That’s the British spirit I have always so admired. Poor man.

       0 likes

  23. Grimer says:

    Of all the criminal scum in society, I hate criminals that prey on the elderly the most. I’m from a small village in Wiltshire. An 86-year-old lady opened the door to the ‘gas man’. He punched her in the face and kicked her while she lay on the floor. Luckily a neighbour heard her screams and came to help. Unfortunately, the scum escaped, as the neighbour was more concerned with ensuring the victim was OK.

    Personally, I’d give any bogus caller 20 years. In this case, where the victim has died, minimum sentences of 30 – 40 years seem appropriate.

    I’d recommend a short story called “The Veteran” by Frederick Forsyth. Almost exactly the same thing happens in the book and I challenge any reader not to agree with the justice handed out at the end.

       0 likes

  24. Ashley Pomeroy says:

    Nick Robinson’s blog has a thing about Charles Kennedy being a raging drunkard:
    http://blogs.bbc.co.uk/nickrobinson/

    The thrust of his post is that the BBC knew about this for ages and covered it up; but they were moved to mention it explicitly because they were going to be scooped by ITN, who “were to run anonymous allegations that he was undergoing treatment”.

    The next paragraph begins:
    “Believe me, until then, that wasn’t simply a secret we’d not thought it right to tell you.”

    In my experience when someone says “believe me” they are not actually telling the truth, to put it as Roy Walker might put it. Elsewhere Nick justifies his silence – he could have been a crusading journalist, but no – by saying that everybody else was silent too and that it wasn’t worth mentioning and didn’t impair Kennedy’s ability to do the job. Although from what I remember it *did* impair his ability to deliver speeches and make public appearances, but presumably he must have been fully in charge of his sobriety when he was in meetings and so forth.

       0 likes

  25. A Lurker says:

    For those of ypou who want to bait lefties about Gorgeous George in BB – don’t bother.

    GG has always split the left – some seeing him as a brave, eloquant man speaking out against an unjust war and others on the left who see him as a vainglorious, egotistical idiot who does the left and teh anti war movement no good. Following his astounding decison to appear on BB there are very, few lefties who would defend this fool.

    GG has managed the unique trick of uniting the right AND the left in their opposition and loathing of his. Let’s ceasefire for just a momnet celebrate this amazing feat.

       0 likes

  26. GCooper says:

    To pick up the point made by Ashley Pomeroy, I find it deeply disturbing that no one in our wonderful media had the integrity to report the truth about Kennedy.

    Had (and I admit it was unlikely) the LibDems won the last election, Kennedy’s finger would have been on the metaphorical button.

    Does no one at the BBC, ITV or in Fleet St really not consider it their duty to have warned us how unsteady that hand would have been?

       0 likes

  27. Rob White says:

    For once ON TOPIC!

    Radio 5 done the same 2 mins ago…. “Leader of the Opposition”

    mmm?

       0 likes

  28. Ashley Pomeroy says:

    And how many other secrets are they keeping from us, because they think we don’t need to know a certain thing about a certain politician? This kind of thing is common in the pop tabloid world – no-one had a bad word to say about Take That, Michael Barrymore, George Michael etc when positive coverage of them was guaranteed to sell newspapers, even though everyone knew that they had committed greater or lesser transgressions which would have had them crucified if they had been cabinet ministers. The Beatles had a safe ride; I’m sure this kind of thing goes back to Roman times and beforehand, the media tends to gloss over things which it would rather not deal with. The BBC’s problem is that it is supposed to be better than that.

    And suppose, as GCooper mentions above, Kennedy had led his party to much greater success? Would the BBC have come out and told us that all the people voting for him were voting for an unreliable, self-deluding alcoholic? Or would that not have been worth mentioning? “We don’t need to trouble the public with that kind of thing.”

       0 likes

  29. anonymous says:

    Further on the topic of Kennedy’s drinking, this shocking admission was made in Nick Robinson’s blog: “The BBC received information that Mr Kennedy was undergoing treatment for an alcohol problem. This was put to Mr Kennedy’s office who issued a flat denial. With that – and without independent evidence – the BBC decided it could not run the story.”

    Since when did the BBC decide to publish stories after trying to obtain independent evidence? They certainly did not, for example, when it came to allegations of Israeli brutality towards Palestinians.

       0 likes

  30. roy says:

    A Lurker ” Following his astounding decison to appear on BB there are very, few lefties who would defend this fool.”

    How do you know? Are you someone important?

       0 likes

  31. ed says:

    Actually, Rob Read, I think it may have been unfortunately misleading in that the least satisfactory article was linked:

    This one was better, found in the links to the one Cockney linked

    Murder is the first word.

       0 likes

  32. GCooper says:

    Anonymous writes:

    “Further on the topic of Kennedy’s drinking, this shocking admission was made in Nick Robinson’s blog:…”

    The implication there is that, had the BBC run the story, it would have risked libelling Mr Kennedy because it couldn’t prove it to be true.

    However, other Press reports (including some from BBC sources) suggest that Mr Kennedy’s problems were well known by the Press.

    Someone is being economical with the truth.

       0 likes

  33. Barking says:

    Contact details

       0 likes

  34. Ashley Pomeroy says:

    Contact Details and tell them what?

       0 likes

  35. TomL says:

    Lurker

    Did you see Big Brother last night?
    Priceless

    Galloway – “A politician once said, ‘a politician complaining about the press is like a ships captain complaining about the sea.'”

    Barrymore – “That’s very good – who said it?”

    Galloway – “err…Enoch Powell”

    Barrymore – “Ah, well, he would say that, wouldn’t he?”

    🙂 too funny.

       0 likes

  36. John Moss says:

    Comment from a newbie to this site. Sorry if it’s in the wrong place

    Friday 6 Jan, Toady Prog, Nick Robinson on Charlie Kennedy’s drink problems, said that the media hacks at Westminster had known that he had a problem for years, but hadn’t wanted to stir it up as he was such a nice guy.

    Bet they would have stirred it up if he was a Tory, nice guy or not.

       0 likes

  37. Grimer says:

    John,

    I totally agree. I can’t see Michael Howard getting let off by the press. Although, he’s obviously not a nice guy in the BBC’s eyes because he’s a Conservative.

       0 likes

  38. Rick says:

    5 Live seems to be more and more like Radio Caroline………….I suspect it is a pirate radio station offshore with a crew unfamiliar with English institutions and culture……………..

       0 likes