well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Docmarooned April 18, 2024 at 1:52 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Quick get that deluded asshole Jim Dale over from GB news to spout his brand of utter gibberish.
andyjsnape April 18, 2024 at 1:50 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Suspected slaves found locked in Cambridgeshire building in drugs raid https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-68846024 "Two me...
Fedup2 April 18, 2024 at 1:43 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Wonder how much he really nicked ?
Fedup2 April 18, 2024 at 1:43 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Lets hear it for Ricardo Anderson . Ricardo took a pistol to a street in tottenhamistan in broad daylight and...
atlas_shrugged April 18, 2024 at 1:33 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024> Take away their state funding and what have you got? A fat dungaree wearing man-hating feminist lesbian on a...
Guest Who April 18, 2024 at 1:29 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024Seems they’ve gone global. https://x.com/bbcafrica/status/1780909539950223720?s=61 The BBC’s Global Disinformation team has found that one o...
moggiemoo April 18, 2024 at 1:10 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024I notice it doesn't say whose armed forces they'd be supplying.
Guest Who April 18, 2024 at 1:03 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024https://x.com/cairnlodge1/status/1780651997022019612?s=61 Has to be a set up, or Vile’s new producer.
Ian Rushlow April 18, 2024 at 1:02 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024I didn't even have to click the link to know that this 'news' would involve someone with an excess of...
tomo April 18, 2024 at 12:58 pm on Midweek 17th April 2024They make munitions, munitions sometimes (not often) go bang for no immediately discernable reason - the layout of the buildings...
well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
0 likes
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes