Sons of the Desert, Sons of Anarchy

The Today programme wrapped up today with the usual BBC Islamist nonsense…that the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme is a complete failure that alienates Muslims and must be scrapped…and of course that Mosques and Islam do not radicalise Muslims…it’s the internet.  Oh…and there is no ‘clash of civilisations’….we all get along famously. Interesting that Sara Khan wasn’t invited on to talk about Prevent…possibly because she has been making a very positive case for it whereas the fellow the BBC dragged in, Jannah Mahmood, is a well known critic of the programme who has adopted the Islamist narrative on it.

Even Jon Snow doesn’t believe that old tosh…he brought us the ‘true voices of Muslims in Britain’…telling us that Muslim integration has come to a standstill and the younger Muslims are rejecting liberal Britain…they want a Britain that bends to the will of Allah…and this was in 2007….

 

 

And what of this ‘Trumpesque’ message from the French PM?…

The EU will COLLAPSE if Germany and France do not begin to listen to people’s concerns on immigration and Islamist terrorism, says French PM

Or this?

‘They want us to be Islamised. They despise our country and our values’: Translator at German refugee camp says Muslim migrants display ‘pure hatred’ of Christians 

Will the BBC listen and understand or continue to peddle the Big Lie?

Trump….the new Churchill?

 

Samira Ahmed has this pinned to the top of her Twitter feed…

Pinned Tweet

Trying to find English metaphor for how Trump’s presidency feels to his critics. Come up with: Like Rob from The Archers taking over Radio4.

Let’s help her out….a metaphor for the Trump revolution from England…how about the other great outsider, Winston Churchill, who took over unexpectedly in the middle of a war and won….not sure she had anything so heroic in mind….

Image result for trump  churchill

Fake Newswatch

 

Fascinating, the presenter of BBC’s Newswatch’s reaction to the story about Justin webb and his false claim that Breitbart’s ex-chairman was anti-Semitic.  Was the reaction of one of the BBC’s ‘watchdogs’ one of horror and apology for this outrageous slur?  [H/T  DB and Is the BBC biased?]

Errrr…no.  Quite the opposite in fact.  She, Samira Ahmed, wanted more….she thought the problem was that Webb allowed the interviewee [Joel Pollak, editor of Breitbart] to slap him down with a correction and this just wasn’t on…never mind that Webb was wrong and himself stated that the interviewee was quite right to protest.

Ahmed implicitly compared the Jewish founded Breitbart and its Jewish editor to Islamist extremists and said that Webb essentially wasn’t up to the job of asking searching, challenging questions and needed someone else on to challenge Pollak…such as an Islamist extremist perhaps?

She claimed that the interview was no more than PR for Breitbart…because the editor was able to correct the slander made by Webb.  Can’t have truth getting in the way of a good story can we?

Interesting who joins the conversation….

 

Janine Gibson?  Who she?  Well you may have noted I have mentioned several times now how the BBC seems to be in a very close collaboration with Buzzfeed these days….Gibson is the editor-in-chief of Buzzfeed UK.

Buzzfeed are doing the digging for the BBC’s stories about ‘Fake News’ [LOL] and look who’s in there with them…the boys from Cardiff University …you know the ones…they whose research found that the BBC was in fact ‘right-wing’ [I’m running out of LOL’s]

Back to Samira Ahmed.  So she doesn’t do PR for ‘extremists’ and challenges those who come on her own programmes?  Really? Well there’s Tommy Robinson who she calls a racist straight out of the box without detailing the reasons for this insult but who then goes on to make his case himself at length….

But look whose on the couch with him…one Inayat Bunglawala...a well known Islamist and,  some say, anti-Semite…..

His stated belief that the BBC and the rest of the media are ‘Zionist controlled.'” You can see where Bunglawala made this clear here. His exact words were:
‘The chairman of Carlton Communications is Michael Green of the Tribe of Judah. He has joined an elite club whose members include fellow Jews Michael Grade and Alan Yentob…[They are] close friends… so that’s what they mean by a ‘free media”

Bunglawala has along and inglorious record of supporting terrorists….even after they have committed their acts of terror…and note…1993 is long before 2003 and the Iraq War which is the date from which the BBC says Islamic radicalisation began in Britain…thus blaming it all on Blair and the West…

In January 1993, Mr Bunglawala wrote a letter to Private Eye, the satirical magazine, in which he called the blind Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman “courageous” – just a month before he bombed the World Trade Center in New York. After Rahman’s arrest in July that year, Mr Bunglawala said that it was probably only because of his “calling on Muslims to fulfil their duty to Allah and to fight against oppression and oppressors everywhere”.

Five months before 9/11, Mr Bunglawala also circulated writings of Osama bin Laden, who he regarded as a “freedom fighter”, to hundreds of Muslims in Britain.

Ahmed is quite happy to step in to defend Bunglawala and others ‘who aren’t in the studio to defend themselves’...but conversely quite happy to see Webb slander someone who is not in the studio…in fact she wants more of it!

Rantzen calls Bunglawala a ‘moderate’….unbelievable when she has just heard what he has said in the past and who he worked for…the extremist MCB.

Ahmed is completely uninterested in tackling Bunglawala’s own radicalism and targets Robinson alone…though I have to say that far from being the challenging and rigorous interview she demanded from Webb hers was also pretty lighweight and Robinson was able to make his case pretty well despite being vastly outnumbered.

So Ahmed’s idea of a good interview is to pack in the critics and not only ignore the fact that one of them is a hardcore Islamist but to bat away any exploration of his extreme views whilst also failing to do her own research on Robinson…not defining what his views are, merely shouting ‘racist’ at him instead.

Great hypocrisy, great superiority and great arrogance. Great journalism. [oh look…one LOL left]

Webb of Deceit

 

 

The BBC has suddenly become very interested in protecting Jews from anti-Semitic political figures, no not those in the Labour Party but those who come from the ‘Alt-Right’ as the BBC’s new Newspeak lexicon of words and phrases hunts out new ways to define and defame Trump and his supporters ….along with the great phrase ‘Post Truth’ . [What’s so great about that phrase is that it immediately identifies the user as a lefty and an idiot who can be safely ignored as someone who doesn’t think for themselves but just parrots the ‘right’ right-on phrases they’ve picked up in the Guardian or in the New Stateman hoping it makes them look and sound clever]

Ironically the BBC itself may be said to be one of the major causes of the rise of anti-Semitism as it buries the deadly effects of immigration into Europe of those who hold such views and encourages us to welcome ever more of them into Europe,  and by its reprehensible, extreme and one-sided reporting about Israel and its close working association with Hamas members in Gaza…the BBC infamously and blatantly revealing its views about Israel when a reporter suggested that Jews should expect to be attacked in Europe because of what Israel does.

So yes, Labour’s little problem gets relatively little attention, Jews being forced to flee Europe once again also receive scant attention, certainly the real causes of that barely merit investigation but someone from a right-leaning news website, Breitbart [founded by a Jew] who goes to work for Trump is inexcusably and inaccurately accused by Justin Webb [He who told us all the evidence pointed towards the Boston bombs being the work of white supremacists] of not liking Jews….from Guido…

An entertaining Today programme to-and-fro about Breitbart’s chief Trump strategist Steve Bannon. Justin Webb boldly told Breitbart* editor Joel Pollack that Bannon “doesn’t like Jews”, Pollack replied that he [Pollack] is an orthodox Jew who observes the Shabbat and eats kosher food, and that Bannon is not an anti-Semite. Undeterred, Webb asked why a Breitbart report mentioned that the journalist Anne Applebaum is Jewish. Pollack replied: “I don’t know, why don’t you ask the Jewish author of that sentence?”

Justin Webb gets slapped down in no uncertain terms [for the second time this week as he earlier this week falsely told listeners that the NHS was attempting to keep reforms secret] and then whines, unconvincingly, that he wasn’t at all meaning that Bannon or anyone else was anti-Semitic….and kosher pigs will fly.  [If only more politicians and interviewees would stand up to the BBC’s bullying and intimidation]

Curiously the BBC doesn’t tackle the real story today…that the Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell, incited people to armed rebellion……how is it that the BBC can ignore the second most senior person in Labour encouraging people to attack politicians, the police and the army…on a day when the killer of Jo Cox is on trial for the murder of a politician that the BBC and its chums on the Left all told us was an appalling attack on democracy, the result of an atmosphere of disrespect and hate for politicians driven by the Right.  The reality is it is the Left which drives the most dangerous anti-politician, anti-Establishment narrative, one that the BBC is at the forefront of supporting be they black rioters, student rioters or Occupy aiming to smash Capitalism and all that.

McDonnell wrote this in 2011….a mere 5 years ago, not when he was an overexcited, hot-headed youth, but supposedly a mature, experienced and measured politician in a very senior position….

Who knows what other operations the secret police and secret services carry out against those who campaign for change in this society? Imagine what lengths the ruling class would go to in order to preserve all of its wealth and power. 

“In fact, we don’t have to imagine; there are clear examples of it in recent history. In Chile in the 1970s there was a Popular Unity government that enacted the mildest reforms, while the people demanded more rapid change. 

“The Chilean ruling class response, with the backing of the US, was to unleash a bloody dictatorship that led to the murder and disappearance of thousands of people.

“Any government of the working class would face violent resistance from the ruling class and would need to immediately disband and break up the armed wing of the rich and powerful – the police, the army and the secret services. This could only be done with the working class being armed and ready to take power.”

“This timely pamphlet details the devastating effect of the cuts now underway as well as the range of resistance to them.

“Our response is also beginning to emerge. It can go one of two ways. We can acquiesce and do nothing or we can stand up and tell them we are not taking it any more.

“Saying no to this government’s plans can take many forms ranging from our demonstrations to direct action and industrial action, to cultural interventions by artists and writers. All should be aimed at creating a climate of resistance that brings this government down.”

McDonnell is clearly saying that the working class should arm themselves because the only way the Establishment can be overturned is with force as they will resist the revolution, and he wants that revolution….so if you instigate revolution you know it will be met with force, therefore you must use force…therefore you are urging armed revolution….as any revolution can only succeed using the force of arms.

Curious the BBC ignores such an inflammatory and dangerous statement made so recently by someone so senior at the centre of our politics and yet concerns itself with the words of a bitter divorcee about an American advisor to Trump that are clearly false, had the BBC bothered to do the slightest research…research that didn’t just confirm its own prejudices….never mind spending the whole of the election demonising Trump for saying he could, if he wanted to, grab a woman by the ‘pussy’ as an illustration of what rich and powerful men like him could get away with if they wanted to….however he never said he actually did such a thing…a point conveniently missed by the BBC.  Funny what interests the BBC.

 

 

 

The BBC has gone to war

 

The BBC has gone to war, against the government, against those who voted for Brexit,  against Trump and those who voted for him.  The BBC’s bubble, it’s comfort zone, where it and its fellow travellers control the media narrative and thus they hope the politicians, is being rapidly burst as the unthinkable happens, and keeps on happening.  A majority Tory government was never supposed to happen, the BBC predicted the end of the normal party political system, Brexit was never going to happen and Trump, that racist, sexist, vulgar Islamophobe had no chance in hell of getting elected….and what next as elections and referendums are ongoing across Europe?  The BBC is terrified it is all over for them and their ilk.

The BBC as political analyst is pretty much a waste of space.

The reason is simple…they don’t deliver the news they deliver what they want you to hear…and that doesn’t correspond to reality.

Their desperate response, as the Right sweeps to victory across the free world, is to go to war.

It’s a war of words but with massive political implications.  The BBC in the last three days has fed the watching public three huge lies.  Three huge lies that are massively political and with what the BBC hopes huge political fallout.

First we had the attack on Trump claiming he had betrayed the people who voted for him saying he had now u-turned on Obamacare…the truth was that what the BBC claimed he only said a few days ago he actually said over a year ago and then again many times more, in televised debates. Second big lie….the NHS is attempting to keep its reforms a secret because they are so bad…again a lie, a lie shot down on the Today programme by the man who authored the report that the BBC was basing their big lie upon…and yet throughout the day they kept up that lie.  The third big lie came today when they quite deliberately reported, without any regard as to whether it was true or not, that ‘a cabinet memo’ had been leaked that made serious and damaging criticisms of the government and the Brexit process.  This was a blatant lie that was also shot down on the Today programme and yet the BBC continued to report the memo as if it was fact, even though they at one stage admitted it was merely a firm of consultants pitching for business from the government and was not solicited nor commissioned by the goverment.  The BBC are now telling us how important this memo is despite it being to all intents and purposes a ‘fake’ leaked by the Remain camp in order to stir up trouble….

Does the Brexit memo matter?

The document does matter because it underlines what we have reported and others have written about many times.

No, actually, it doesn’t matter one jot.  It says nothing that hasn’t been spun by anti-Brexit sources for months now…there’s nothing new and it has absolutely no authority nor credibility being a freelance effort by a company that is desperate to stay in the EU.  To the BBC it is important because it peddles the same pro-EU narrative that the BBC has been peddling for months now.  Go figure.

No coincidence that the fake ‘cabinet memo’ parrots exactly the themes of Labour’s John McDonnell’s upcoming speech and has been released just before he makes this speech…..

Meanwhile, shadow chancellor John McDonnell is due to say that the government’s “shambolic” approach to Brexit is failing to equip the UK economy for leaving the EU.

In a speech later, he will say the chancellor is isolated from cabinet colleagues and “too weak” to make Brexit a success.

 

The BBC is certainly going big.  Goebbels, Hitler’s master of propaganda, operated on the principle that the bigger the lie the more likely people are to believe it, and the more often it was made the better.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

The problem the BBC has these days is that the Internet makes lying much more tricky.  Not only can people easily fact-check you but can then disseminate the truth to counter your lies that much more easily as they have never been able to before.

Which is why the BBC spends so much time now trying to persuade politicians to rein in and control the internet.  We’ve had the BBC stories about fake news, nearly always the attack is on ‘right leaning’ sources, though the BBC itself ironically being the master of that particular skill of disseminating fake news, and this line of attack resurfaced yesterday as the BBC helps those on the Left to try to attack Facebook by claiming it helped Trump become president and that Breitbart, which the BBC hates and falsely describes as essentially a far-right extremist, racist, anti-semitic site, also helped and now has one of its bosses advising Trump.  The BBC is obsessed with Facebook doing several long stories on it….

Facebook’s fake news crisis deepens

Read more:

How can Facebook fix its fake news?

The rise and rise of fake news

Trump’s ‘hidden’ Facebook army

Zuckerberg promises fake news action

Facebook fake news: Denzel praises Trump

‘I write fake news that gets shared on Facebook’

 

Note how once again the news source feeding the BBC the story is Buzzfeed…..the BBC seems to have a very, very close partnership with Buzzfeed….does it use Buzzfeed to dig out stories it can’t break for fear of looking partisan and then reports them as ‘Buzzfeed stories’? [It did the same with Whittingdale…they couldn’t break the story of his dalliances with a prostitute because it would look too obviously a politically motivated hit job…so they, in collaboration with anti-Press campaigners, got a small, almost unknown, website to break the story]

The BBC et al are aiming to control who is allowed to publish on the internet and what they say….they want to have the right to judge what is news, what kind of news stories are published, to make judgement calls on not just their truth but also on their merits ethically and morally or merely whether they fit in with the likes of the BBC’s own values and beliefs.

It is an extremely sinister attack on free speech and thought.  The BBC aims to police the internet so that news and views are filtered through a left-wing prism….want to talk about immigration or Islam or climate change?  No, sorry, they can’t approve that.

As said many times here, the BBC is one of the greatest threats to democracy, freedom and a civilised society.

 

 

 

JOIN THE DOTS….

The BBC milked this story for all it has been worth as part of its nauseating “The Government doesn’t know what to do about Brexit”…..and then this arrived later in the day

Downing Street has “wholeheartedly” rejected comments in a memorandum leaked to the press describing cabinet “divisions” over Brexit.

The document, compiled by consultancy firm Deloitte and obtained by the Times newspaper, says Whitehall is working on 500 Brexit-related projects and could need 30,000 extra staff. But the prime minister’s spokeswoman said the work had been “unsolicited”. And Deloitte said there had been no “access” to Number 10 for the report. No “input from any other government departments” had been received, the company added.

And then I should remind you of this...

David Sproul, Deloitte’s UK chief executive, is in favour of the UK remaining part of the European Union, while the rest of the Big Four keep their cards close to their chest

Deloitte – one more embittered Remain organisation being used by the BBC in pursuance of its Remain agenda.

Will they EVER stop weeping?

BUILD THE WALL…

A Biased BBC reader writes…

“The News at Ten carried a rather gratuitous and grizzly feature last night where Ian Pannell prances around with the drug cartels, ghoulishly watching people inject heroin and dishevelled child drug mules, to show what an amazing journalist he is. The images of squalor, desperation, jacking up and overdosing were framed against Donald Trump’s “build a wall” policy.  

We know that, for the BBC, exposure to facts and genuine information does not matter anymore. If you can stomach the vulgarity and exploitation of the report – and if only the BBC could look beyond its bias and rhetoric – then facts and genuine information would suggest that improved border security – like a wall – is vital to stop the spread a heroin plague sweeping America, leaving countless people dead in its wake. 

Shame then that the BBC has spent the last 18 months stating that “build a wall” policy is vile and racist, born from hate speech and intolerance.  I wonder what would have happened if they ran this report when Trump announced the policy…”

Quality

 

Fom Guido:

The BBC’s World News America presenter Katty Kay is somewhat creatively telling US television viewers that Britons regret voting for Brexit. Last night Katty said on NBC’s Meet the Press that people didn’t really want to Leave and that Remain would win a second referendum:

“We did opinion polls afterwards that showed that, actually, if we were to hold the referendum again, Remain would win. There were people who came on the BBC who said, “You know what? I voted to leave but I didn’t actually think we were going to leave. It was a protest vote.” And I think what we’ve seen during the course of this week is the kind of simple, clarion call of change crashing up against the complexity of actually governing.”

This is for the birds, as recent YouGov polls and the pollster Matthew Goodwin have explained:

“There is scant evidence of buyer’s remorse. As the tumultuous summer of 2016 drew to a close, 52 per cent of voters still said that Brexit was the “right decision”.”

The Beeboids just don’t get it