Crocodile Tears For The Victims of 7/7 And Tunisia?

 

For the BBC there seems to be no ‘why’ for 7/7.

Or at least when listening to their coverage of the anniversary one thing is missing….the question asking what was the motivation for the attacks, why did 4 Muslims attack ‘The West’?

The BBC looks even to have put aside its normal infantile, dangerous and highly politicised reason…the Iraq War….The BBC knows this is a false message, a deliberate lie by the BBC intent on hiding the real reasons for ‘radicalisation’.

In its place there is a constant stream of remarks about ‘young British lads’, though not ‘Muslims’, and thoughts that we musn’t ‘demonise Muslims’. …repeatedly emphasising this quote from Baroness Manningham-Buller, ex-director-general of MI5:

“I think we’ve got to be very careful not to demonise the Muslim community, quote unquote – I’m not sure there is a Muslim community – there are a lot of British Muslims from all sorts of communities.

“From the time I was in the service successes often depended on British Muslims giving us information in confidence – often at risk to their lives – and Muslim members of staff helping us to understand these issues. And therefore I think labelling whole communities is not wise.”

[Always odd how it is always claimed that the Jihadists are not Muslims and yet the cause of radicalisation is Muslim anger….so at what point do ‘angry Muslims’ become ‘apostates’ and join the ranks of the infidels? Just where is that line when a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim?]

Is it demonisation to ask why the ‘Muslim community’, and it is ‘credible’, mainstream community leaders who push this message, consistently sends out a message about being angry about British foreign policy and that this is the cause of radicalisation….in effect reinforcing the message of the Jihadi recruiters with the same message…..the same Muslim community that thinks 9/11 and 7/7 were conspiracies by intelligence agencies, the Jews or this government….so much so that the BBC had to put out a film showing such beliefs about 7/7, spread by mainstream Muslim leaders, were completely wrong.

Here is an image from a BBC report into 7/7 many years ago titled ‘It starts here: Street campaigning and agitation, late 1990s’…..  ‘It’ of course being Muslim radicalisation…..

An Al Muhajiroun poster from the mid 1990s declaring "Muslims against western values"

The BBC knew the real reasons for radicalisation and yet, despite that report, still pushes the message about the Iraq War so the same questions that are asked of the Muslim communty can of course be asked of the BBC and its  message about the Iraq War, a ‘war against Islam’ and Britain’s, the West’s, ‘history of ancient wrongs’ against Muslims.

Fresh from blaming the Jews for making themselves targets it may be somewhat galling for people to see the BBC now fawning over the survivors and the families of victims of 7/7 when the BBC has done so much to promote the Jihadi cause, just as some people may have been surprised if not angered by having the BBC’s Phil Mackie sent to report on and sympathise with the relatives of those killed in Tunisia…the same Phil Mackie who made it his job to downplay the Trojan Horse plot and attempt to dismiss it as the work of racist, paranoid Islamophobes….

pm th…and who admitted that he tried to avoid using the words ‘extremist’or ‘Islamist’ in relation to the story…thus covering up the motivation behind the plot…and the fact that ‘conservative’ Islam,, ie Islam, is in relation to a Western democratic, secular society ‘extreme’.

Of course it wasn’t just Mackie but the BBC itself that tried to paint the plot as a hoax….the BBC coming up with this infamous lie…

It was alleged last year extremists had tried to take over several schools in Birmingham to advance radical interpretations of Islam.

A series of official investigations found the claims to be groundless.

Really?…….from yesterday….

Peter Clarke was head of the Counter Terrorism Command at Scotland Yard from 2002 until 2008

7/7 bombings: Why we can never stop tackling extremism

There can be no room for complacency.

Last year, I was asked to conduct the so-called Trojan Horse inquiry into allegations of infiltration of schools by Islamist extremists. The evidence was clear that there were people in positions of influence in some schools in Birmingham who held intolerant and extremist views.

Extraordinarily, the Commons education select committee published a report earlier this year saying that only one, isolated example of extremism had been found. This flew in the face of the evidence, and the Government has now firmly rejected the report, saying that it “downplays the seriousness of events in Birmingham and risks undermining our efforts to tackle extremism”.

The tragic irony is that this government rebuttal was issued on the day that 39 people were murdered on a Tunisian beach by a man whose route to terrorism may have started with someone telling him that intolerance of others’ beliefs and values is a virtue.

 

Despite that even yesterday’s BBC’s report of the Government reaction still plays the same game it played before…

The government has claimed MPs risked undermining efforts to tackle extremism by downplaying the seriousness of the “Trojan Horse” events in Birmingham.

Several inquiries and investigations were launched after an anonymous letter surfaced last March containing instructions for installing sympathetic school governors.

It has since been regarded as a hoax in some quarters and claims made about a number of schools named in the letter have been deemed groundless.

 

Perhaps the politicians are right and the BBC needs to pick a side…..the Jihadis or Western Society….many people might suggest the BBC already has picked a side…that of the Jihadis.

 

 

 

 

Bookmark the permalink.

47 Responses to Crocodile Tears For The Victims of 7/7 And Tunisia?

  1. Charles says:

    Just got my Roku streaming stick, and it’s excellent. For just £40 one-off I have now access all the OD services, iPlayer, Channel 4, ITV, Sky News and of course YouTube – all on my main TV in the living room. When viewing YouTube, you can use your smart phone as a control interface – really excellent. I have not renewed my TV Licence – it is completely unnecessary!

       41 likes

  2. Stuart B(eaker) says:

    When you concentrate entirely on the shock, grief and suffering of the poor victims of such an atrocity, you are in danger of treating it as if it were a natural disaster, on a par with the Nepal earthquake.

    In avoiding the obvious – that the 7/7 bombings were a despicable act, perpetrated by people with no humanity, no regard for the suffering they deliberately inflicted – then you rob their victims of even an explanation of why their lives were torn apart. You perpetuate an aspect of their suffering which demands help, even if their bodies, or the bodies of their dead relatives, cannot be mended. It adds insult to injury, under a hypocritical cover of ‘caring’ and ’empathy’.

       69 likes

    • ICBBC says:

      The 7/7 bombings were perpetrated by a bunch of Muslim traitors, whose loyalty to Islam trumped any allegiance to the country that gave them shelter, and a free and good life.

      Its very likely that almost all Muslims currently living in the UK with British citizenship or not, would prefer to live under sharia. That does not mean going to a Muslim country, but imposing sharia in the UK.

      In the meantime, they will suck on Benefits, and make life uncomfortable for the Infidel nation with rapes, burglaries, and the occasional Jihad. Our leaders and MSM meanwhile proclaim the Big Lie of “this has nothing to with Islam” nonsense.

      The law must be changed. All those who advocate sharia in anyway must be viewed as traitors to the Crown, and removed from Britain forthwith.

         73 likes

      • grimer says:

        It’s like the term ‘home grown’. They weren’t ‘home grown’. Their parents didn’t integrate and raise their children with British values. If they had, they wouldn’t have gone out and committed mass murder to ‘defend Islam’. They were a product of Pakistani culture and were effectively ‘Pakistani grown’ within the borders of the UK. Such are the joys of multiculturalism. How truly enriched, we surely are.

           39 likes

      • Laska says:

        Regarding Bernard Lewis he is interesting regarding the problem that the Ottoman’s had regarding their embassies. These had to head off to Paris, etc, but had to return to the Ottoman-ruled lands – Muslim lands – because a Hadith stated that Muslims had to live in Muslim lands. This was a stumbling block to permanent embassies but also Muslims living in the West. At some point a “clarification” occurred that allowed permanent embassies which thus allowed the exodus of Muslims to the West. But there was a catch and this is where Jihad comes in: you could live in such lands on the presumption that you make them Muslim. I have spoken to many young Muslims who – after their initial pretence of ignorance and then shock that I know this – go on to accept this as logical and correct. That is the basis of tension we are now witnessing when the Muslim population reaches a critical mass. On a general point people always want to recreat their culture/civilisation where ever they are. Muslims are particularly invested in this because they consider Islam the perfect society. They are happy and there are few “disequilibrium” issues. The only one they have is that Islam is economically weak and unable to give them what the West can.

           16 likes

        • ICBBC says:

          Good and informative post.

          The basis of Muslims living as virtual dhimmis in Christian lands is that they are following the example of Muhammed’s Hijra. So they live here, sucking at the teat of Western wealth, waiting for an opportune time, when their numbers begin to tell.

          Muslims by their religion, can never give total allegiance to the UK. Islam will always trump allegiance to a Kuffar nation.

          Thats is why it is essential that a policy of repatriation start soon.

             2 likes

  3. JimS says:

    The BBC ought to be a ‘one nation’ broadcaster yet instead it creates and maintains division.

    It readily finds ‘community leaders’ for every minority at the same time insisting that there are no communities, just ‘ordinary’ Britons. Remarkably white Britons, unfortunately still in the majority, have no culture, no values and no leaders, according to the BBC.

    How about the BBC show a bit of ‘community cohesion’ by getting rid of the Asian Network and Radio 1 Extra?

       71 likes

    • Sickofitall says:

      Because the BBC would consider that to be the wrong kind of community cohesion.

         20 likes

    • baldnunn says:

      “The BBC ought to be a ‘one nation’ broadcaster yet instead it creates and maintains division.” That echos the way in which their political wing, the Labour Party, governs when they are in power.

         9 likes

  4. ThEEnD says:

    It is coming, and when It comes you had better pick a side.

    We all know it is coming, the BBC knows, the Government knows, the EU knows, the US knows.

    It is partly why they took away our guns, it is partly why Obama is trying so hard to take away the Americans guns (and failing that the Confederate flag at least for now), it is why the Aussies took away their guns, it is why we have so many anti-terror laws, it is why the US has staged military exercises in urban areas, it is why the UK has also staged exercises in urban areas.

    Like I said, pick a side.

       61 likes

    • Cockney says:

      er… Tottenham Hotspur!

      Or am I misunderstanding?

         3 likes

      • Demon says:

        You are a socialist. Misunderstanding the obvious is the normal state for you.

           28 likes

        • brett says:

          CHELSEA, we will buy all the best jihadis and keep em on the bench! Mourinho for prime minister!

             2 likes

  5. DJ says:

    Yep, it’s been ten years and the BBC still can’t find a single survivor or bereaved relative who thinks the true meaning of 7/7 is that we need to stop with the Islamopandering, umanrites garbage and open borders.

    Nope, apparently, every single survivor or relative buys in totally to the standard ‘cycle of violence’ script, complete with sob sister healing circles and multi-cultural outreach. Well, either that, or the BBC’s compassion for the survivors only extends to those who will help it push the narrative. The rest get the David Bellamy Unperson treatment.

       82 likes

    • ID says:

      I was surprised to hear some churchman on World at One. R4 prattling on about 7/7 as if its sole purpose were to undermine the joyous harmony of multiculturalism. Apparently “London is a laboratory” and “an experiment in cosmopolitanism”. Usually, if experiments are performed on human subjects some form of informed consent is sought. They should have tries it out on rats first.

         36 likes

      • JimS says:

        “Our London is a laboratory for testing whether it will be possible for the cosmopolitan civilisation which is becoming a global reality to hold together. We are in the midst of debate about identity including what it means to be British. Some in the world are reacting to change by retreating into ever narrower definitions of their identity. And at the same time, merely invoking the universal concepts of tolerance and respect with which we probably all agree, does not generate one iota of the energy required to transform lives and build a community.”

        The Bishop of London
        The Rt Revd & Rt Hon Dr Richard Chartres

        You would think than an ethical experimenter would consult the sentient rats first, wouldn’t you?

           21 likes

        • John Anderson says:

          Richard Chartres is the churchman who conducts the services at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sundays.

          Lord help us.

             21 likes

          • John Anderson says:

            I would have thought there was little need for the Bishop to be scratching around for definitions of what it is to be British. Remembrance Sunday epitomises much of British spirit – order, discipline, pride in the history of the nation and its Commonwealth standing up to dictators and fascism, quiet heroism, due regard for the oedinary man – including the Unknown Warrior, full belief in the Crown as an abiding figurehead, memories of national history without triumphalism, a belief in the “quiet life”.

            We now face fascism again. Is;lamic fascism. Our quiet life is under a lot of threat again.

               31 likes

            • Glen says:

              Remembrance Sunday is already being dumbed down by the bbc scum, they have in the past actually made ex-servicemen apologize for what they did in their part in ridding the world of Hitler.

              The elderly gent was interviewed by sophie raworth about his part in the fighting around Holland, a Dutch freedom fighter was utterly bemused as to why he apologized! His comment..”He never needs to say sorry to the Dutch for what he did”..just the bbc then.

              No doubt next year our heroes will be forced to march behind the foreign fighters who helped to fight the tyranny of nazism…I don’t know which ‘ism’ is more dangerous…socialism, fascism or islamic terrorism, maybe they are one and the same.

                 29 likes

        • dave s says:

          This cosmopolitan civilisation seems to be largely limited to the old countries of Europe. That bishop is typical of the modern Cof E man . Limited brain power and a lack of any historical knowledge.
          The C of E has become a branch of liberalism and the quango world of the so called concerned. Not much of a future for it now and good riddance.

             21 likes

          • ID says:

            The glaring presupposition is that more experiments are needed to determine the viability of “mass cosmopolitanism/multiculturalism”. The various attempted genocides in the last century, the deep rooted, long lasting, racial tensions in the US, and Europe, the murderous religious conflicts in the Middle East, and Far East, should probably be telling anyone capable of rational thought that the repeating the same experiment is going to produce the same results.

               14 likes

            • David A. says:

              But the classic definition of insanity is repeatedly carrying out the same action, expecting a different outcome.

                 5 likes

        • Stuart B(eaker) says:

          I noticed this piece, and thought: No, there is no ‘debate’ on what it means to be British. There is ignorance on what it means to be British, mainly from fortress immigrant communities. The answer to this ignorance is to inform them, and give them a choice.

             19 likes

      • D1004 says:

        They did. When the rats were overwhelmed by sheer force of numbers they turned very nasty and attacked each other….sound familiar ?

           13 likes

    • grimer says:

      I caught a bit of BBC news, on subtitles, in the staff canteen this morning. They were interviewing a survivor of the attacks. She’s left London and lives in a quiet village on the coast ‘where there is little chance of another attack’. The BBC didn’t pick at that scab.

         21 likes

      • dave s says:

        The shire people did change after 7/7. I know from experience and just how few visits to London they now make. Great events maybe but not like it was 30 years ago.
        The London based elite will deny this of course but I believe my own lying eyes and ears. In my large extended family a visit to London is now a rare thing. Likewise with many I know. It is not just the aftermath of 7/7 it is a real fear that London is where bad things might happen and why put your family at risk.
        Now I knew a different London as a boy and roamed freely around it. That London is as far from us now as is the London of the first Elizabeth. Incredibly sad and I do regret it so all you liberals out there reflect on what your absurdities have done to our old capital.

           32 likes

        • A says:

          I would agree, but think it started after the mainland IRA bombing campaigns.
          My mother stopped taking us up to London to see the Christmas lights after I got lost during an evacuation of Harrods.
          My father has commuted daily for the past 35 years, and was in the train behind at Edgware Rd and the next street to one of the city bombings. A recent X-ray revealed yet more glass from when his barracks were blown upon the 1970’s.

             7 likes

    • YU says:

      There was a guy at the time ( I forget his name ) he had an Israeli girlfriend murdered in the bus outrage, he knew the real cause and did get to the point but it looks like he has been ignored this time around or he told them the truth and he has been given the brush off.

         13 likes

  6. G.W.F. says:

    The reference to crocodile tears drew me to locate this tearful sight. Red Ken, who honoured Islamic extremists, weeps whilst listening to his speech after the London bombings. Borrowed from Guido.

    http://order-order.com/2015/07/07/ken-cries-listening-to-his-77-speech/#_@/GUjhz4VUsTuqSw

       29 likes

    • ROBERT BROWN says:

      Mmmm….the same Ken that invited IRA killers, Adams and McGuiness, who ordered the killings of loyalists, policemen,soldiers and to blow apart women and children in the streets, pubs, restaurants of Belfast and other places. They would have done this as they were both ‘Brigade’ commanders……and of course, planning the bombing of the UK mainland….i live in hope that some angry, resourceful ex-soldiers conspire to kill these two and the other gloating scum now free.

         40 likes

  7. AsISeeIt says:

    The BBC began as they meant to go on today with a mawkish focus on the victims – and yes, it may as well have been a natural disaster. Bill Turnbull had the audacity to suggest to Mayor Boris* that the emergency services might have done better. For the BBC it’s like Hillsborough – but without culprits.

    *And of course it was Red Ken who was Mayor in 2005, but still, always worth a quick below the belt jab at Boris

       35 likes

  8. Demon says:

    I think we ought to have a memorial to all British victims of terrorism. There should be roll of all names since the first anarchist threw a smoking bomb into a crowded place and caused fatalities, through the King David Hotel, all innocent victims of the Northern Ireland Troubles (including RUC and army). It must include all British murdered by Islamists or any other warped ideology. It could be done by “campaign” and all new victims should be remembered and added.

    It must not include the names of the perpetrators, their supporters or anyone else that died as a result of helping these low lifes.

       28 likes

  9. Emersonv says:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-33327039

    If you read between the lines , you can see the bbc peddling the myth that the MUslims are the victims,.

    It is probably to late to save this country…

       26 likes

    • brett says:

      The problem is that the newcomers breed like sex crazed rabbits, so soon enough we shall be outnumbered. On the other hand, I think if the newcomers do one day kick off, they shall find the British people to be a formidable opposition, I know who I would bet on. Like ive allways been told, bullys are just cowards

         27 likes

    • ChrisL says:

      So you’re saying the BBC thinks the Muslims are THE victims of 7/7?

      Look at the BBC News website right now and say that again.

      Watch the first half hour or so of this and say that again.
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b061vc8z/77-the-london-bombings-remembered

      Plus there’s the quote from your article: “Despite the 7 July attacks, she says she has not experienced any particular hostility towards her as a Muslim living in London.”

         5 likes

  10. chrisH says:

    After listening to all manner of emoting tripe over the death of these 52 poor souls…I`ve finally heard the word “ISLAM” in a liberal show and tell display.
    No-not the BBC but Channel 4-the historic first mention of Islam came at 7.10pm.
    But not in any way that shone a light onto the Muslims who committed these atrocities ten years on.
    No sirree-the church reader read the name Islam only as a surname of one of the victims…no more, no less.
    Yet of the 52 deaths-that poor persons surname seems to have been chosen for the Channel 4 soundbite.
    Can`t imagine that anyone with the surname of “Christian” would have been used by the Channel 4 suckups.
    So stuff the Lady Di-ification of the atrocity ten years ago.
    No Koran-no comment…but lots of emoting and rosewater to put us off the trail of blood, the stench of Islam.
    Well done Channel 4.

       37 likes

    • Satan says:

      I watched that too, in disbelief! Then, the BBC Thought Police did the exact same thing on the 10 o’clock News.

      It seems that unless you’re a fan of allah or a migrant from a country the global parasite has already destroyed, you don’t matter.

         17 likes

  11. Wells says:

    Im enjoying this story on the BBC website right now:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-33327039

    ” “When I hear about ‘Muslim extremists’, or ‘a Muslim man has done this’ or ‘a Muslim woman has done that’, I think, ‘why is the media presenting it in that way? I am a Muslim but it doesn’t make me bad’,” Jakiya adds. ”

    Then three paragraphs later:

    ” “We will post what’s happening in Palestine [too] because it’s happening to Muslims as well and we’re all the same family.” ”

    So Muslims are all in it together when they are the “victims” (I use that word loosely), but as soon as some Muslims do something bad (which lets face it, happens often) they don’t want to be tarred with the same brush.

       35 likes

  12. Wells says:

    I was also just watching the BBC News channel for a laugh and they happened to interview a Muslim woman who banged on about how Islam doesn’t condone violence and how multicultural London is and it is one big happy family (do members of your family blow themselves up at family get togethers?).

    The best thing was when she was introduced as “the only Muslim survivor of the attacks” and I thought “bloody right cos all the other Muslims had bombs strapped to them”.

       39 likes

  13. Al Shubtill says:

    Watched BBC Look North tonight, the programme hosted from Beeston in Leeds where 3 of these pieces of s**t came from. Why? FFS.

       28 likes

    • YU says:

      As if it was only three from the area, how many others from the area knew but either helped or kept quiet ?

         13 likes

  14. Glen says:

    The fop haired buffoon that is Boris Johnson was an embarrassment on today’s 5 barely alive morning show. His first comment about July 7th was how the bombers had failed in their aims to divide ‘us’.

    Just look at how multicultural London is and how many foreign people come to visit…and then he remembered that 52 people died at the hands of 4 cowards following a warped cult ideology…well done, Boris, you utter tosser.

    He then went to do his bit at the remembrance garden to the victims, a garden cleared of the romanian scum, who had, just days earlier, been using the site as a doss house complete with an outdoor toilet..how Johnson and camoron could show their faces is beyond me.

    That horrible bitch, rachael burden, couldn’t turn down the opportunity for political point scoring either. Whilst interviewing a fireman who was at July 7 she pointed out that the (tory) cuts to the fire service would make it impossible for the service to be able to respond to such an atrocity now, he shot her down in pieces stating that the cuts were made in the right places and that they were more efficient and better equipped now than they were then .

    You see, burden, some people and some organisations can learn from the past and move with the times whereas the bbc just can’t stop being what they are..old, out of touch, biased, lefty, socialist and down right embarrassing.

       35 likes

  15. Doublethinker says:

    Crocodile tears indeed. The BBC broadcast a series of Muslims telling us how they were outraged at the way asian men were being pulled off trains after the bombings, how Muslims in the UK felt shunned and feared attacks in the aftermath etc.etc. Once again the BBC portrays Muslims as the co-victims.
    That they were no reprisals after the bombings and more recent Muslim terror attacks , shows how extraordinarily tolerant the Brits are. Perhaps foolishly so. That were very few voices raised questioning the willingness of the Muslim community to accept that it is their problem and their responsibility to help root out these radicals, also shows the control that the BBC and liberal left have on popular thinking.
    Not only does our tolerance prevent us acting like many other countries would , but we dare not even voice our opinions for fear of being labelled racist by the liberal media.

       28 likes

    • Demon says:

      As I avoided BBC coverage I will take your word on this, particularly as it does have the BBC style all over it. I think Scotty was attacking someone else for predicting that the BBC would do this. An apology from Scotty to the person he attacked would seem appropriate.

         7 likes

      • Anders Thomasson says:

        That was me at whom Scott had a pop. TBH I felt I had finally arrived on here since after several attempts I finally got a response out of Scott. Another correspondent disagreed with me, but quite politely, so he got a polite response from me. You see Scott, that’s the way it works. Play nice even in disagreement and at least some of us will do it back.

           8 likes