May I commend THIS excellent post by Microdave over on Max’s most wonderful site. It tackles the BBC’s perverse coverage of “climate change” and is well worth your time!
Archives
- June 2013 (42)
- May 2013 (102)
- April 2013 (90)
- March 2013 (106)
- February 2013 (83)
- January 2013 (86)
- December 2012 (66)
- November 2012 (127)
- October 2012 (98)
- September 2012 (110)
- August 2012 (107)
- July 2012 (151)
- June 2012 (122)
- May 2012 (151)
- April 2012 (105)
- March 2012 (111)
- February 2012 (102)
- January 2012 (110)
- December 2011 (106)
- November 2011 (131)
- October 2011 (131)
- September 2011 (121)
- August 2011 (140)
- July 2011 (138)
- June 2011 (105)
- May 2011 (100)
- April 2011 (77)
- March 2011 (124)
- February 2011 (85)
- January 2011 (117)
- December 2010 (94)
- November 2010 (105)
- October 2010 (144)
- September 2010 (147)
- August 2010 (153)
- July 2010 (128)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (100)
- April 2010 (83)
- March 2010 (103)
- February 2010 (103)
- January 2010 (116)
- December 2009 (118)
- November 2009 (123)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (154)
- August 2009 (135)
- July 2009 (111)
- June 2009 (97)
- May 2009 (114)
- April 2009 (101)
- March 2009 (110)
- February 2009 (107)
- January 2009 (116)
- December 2008 (75)
- November 2008 (85)
- October 2008 (131)
- September 2008 (112)
- August 2008 (70)
- July 2008 (74)
- June 2008 (95)
- May 2008 (60)
- April 2008 (55)
- March 2008 (54)
- February 2008 (61)
- January 2008 (31)
- December 2007 (18)
- November 2007 (32)
- October 2007 (60)
- September 2007 (74)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (51)
- June 2007 (21)
- May 2007 (20)
- April 2007 (24)
- March 2007 (15)
- February 2007 (24)
- January 2007 (53)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (38)
- October 2006 (47)
- September 2006 (35)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (36)
- June 2006 (41)
- May 2006 (28)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (35)
- January 2006 (28)
- December 2005 (66)
- November 2005 (28)
- October 2005 (39)
- September 2005 (36)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (23)
- June 2005 (21)
- May 2005 (30)
- April 2005 (35)
- March 2005 (36)
- February 2005 (36)
- January 2005 (42)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (33)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (39)
- August 2004 (24)
- July 2004 (32)
- June 2004 (27)
- May 2004 (15)
- April 2004 (30)
- March 2004 (39)
- February 2004 (32)
- January 2004 (51)
- December 2003 (49)
- November 2003 (43)
- October 2003 (34)
- September 2003 (38)
Search B-BBC







Good find, merely confirming what we all knew all along.
The BBC really are the pits, aren’t they?
Things have moved on since this report. Labour MP Graham Stringer wrote a letter to the BBC director-general, but I have no idea of its contents or if their was a reply. My guess is that fellows of the Royal Society will attack the BBC’s coverage of Climate Change before the Governments Science Committee is persuaded to do something about it. This is what I guess is planned for May of next year.
I’m always surprised at the lack of interest on here with regard to any post on man-made global warming. There is a reason the BBC backs this movement to the hilt and it’s because it underpins a wider environmental/political agenda which encapsulates pretty well all the ideologies imbued in the BBC’s output. Regular followers of sceptics’ websites such as The Global Warming Policy Foundation and No Frakking Consensus will already know this, but for others not up to speed on the scam that is little more than a massive environmental and socialist elite looking to create a totalitarian world government, read Delingpole’s ‘Watermelons’ (green on the outside, red on the inside) and Laframboise’s ‘The Delinquent Teenager’. It’s eye-popping stuff.
Precisely. Anyone who looks into the Man Made Global warming scam can quickly see the whole thing is a massive fraud.
Anyone except E Davey, D Cameron, N Clegg, BBC, Guardian Media Group, The Independent (of Reality), assorted Sky News and ITV hangers on, The EU the UN, Greenpeace WWF CAFOD Oxfam, the Universities that employ the lying academics like UAE, the Energy Fraudster EDF, the subsidy-dependant “renewables” Industry, and all the other rent-seeking parasites.
This gravy train is tooooo good to get off.
Which is precisely why it needs to be derailed.
Ignorance of the basics is the main problem. The best sceptic website for me is Google scholar. Enter words and phrases on this site and you find answers to questions most scientists do not ask, because the debate is over. How can their be a consensus when most scientists do not know how to calibrate carbon dioxide warming on the surface of a planets atmosphere. The Unified Theory of Climate shows that with the carbon dioxide atmospheres of Venus and Mars as well as the atmosphere of the Earth the increase in pressure reduces the speed of transfer of heat, the increase in heat maintains the equilibrium with the input of heat from the Sun, as more heat is transferred but at a slower rate, maintaining the equilibrium. With the increase in pressure using the Unified Theory of Climate, you get a calculation that gives a result for the 20th Century Man-made warming of about 0.001 Kelvin. So the change in temperature on the surface is caused by the change in the grey body temperature and that is caused by a change in the Earths cloud albedo. So if you want to find out what causes climate change. An hour long DVD about Cosmoclimatology called “The Cloud Mystery” has been produced by an independent production company. The DVD can be purchased on the http://www.thecloudmystery.com website. A book called “The Chilling Stars” was published in 2007 after Henrik Svensmark completed his work. And if you are a Mensa member, join the Space Special interest group for further information about the above.