RICHARD BLACK REDUX!

  By David Vance | March 14, 2012 - 10:16 pm |

Here’s a most excellent dissection of Biased BBC “favourite”, Richard Black by Jonova. Do give it a read please.

Click through to read and contribute comments on this post.

Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to RICHARD BLACK REDUX!

  1. cjhartnett says:
    March 14, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    A brilliant Lent talk tonight from Professor John Lennox (8.45pm radio 4)…a real scientist who is so articulate that the likes of Dawkins don`t debate him twice if they`re brave enough to do it at all.
    I`m guessing that he must have blagged Blacks lanyard…how else could a true scientist get himself past the Guardianistas at reception.
    Any chance of this man being asked to talk to Shukman, Black, Harrabin and the other Professor Nods of liberal tropes?
    Maybe once is all we need then! He was brilliant in my opinion.

       0 likes

  2. Millie Tant says:
    March 14, 2012 at 11:14 pm

    Ah, the “Lent” Talks cast in such a way that they have a Muslim talking about Islam:
    Speakers of this year’s talks include the journalist and author Martin Wroe, who will explore humanity being at its most divine when working in community; Tariq Ramadan, Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies in the Faculty of Oriental Studies at Oxford University, examines the philosophy of the individual and how this is neglected in many areas of Islam; Dr Gemma Simmonds CJ, explores the agony of the individual in society.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01d2h8v

       0 likes

    • cjhartnett says:
      March 15, 2012 at 10:09 am

      Hope the BBC will let Lennox gatecrash Ramadan in that case…and I`d not be surprised if Tariq Ramandan won`t be giving coded messages out when he gets the chance to besmirch this series on Lent.
      Thankfully one Lennox is worth as thousand Guardian editorials…but that doesn`t exonerate the BB

         0 likes

  3. London Calling says:
    March 14, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    If there is one thing worse than “racists”, it is “race hustlers”. Looks like what we have here.

    If you ask people if they recall Little Rock, Arkansas, and the use of the National Guard by Governor Faubus against busing black school children, and you ask them what party of Governer Faubus held power in the state… 

    Democrat.

    Funny how real life is much more complicated than the leftie comic-strip journos would have you believe.

       0 likes

    • cjhartnett says:
      March 15, 2012 at 10:06 am

      Someone recently posted up a fine few minutes where a Republican destroys any historical claim by the Democrats that they were ever on the side of the black perosn.
      Can`t remember it, but hope they`ll put it up again sometime.
      Basically the Democrats only befriended the black vote after the death of the Kennedys, and wanted its payroll vote down south…and , as the man says, the Democrats have kept the blacks dependent on share cropping pittances just as any master of old would have done.
      Important to remind the BBC etc about it being Republicans that are the historical advocate for freedom for black and white-whereas the racist Democrats waited to see if they`d get more votes by bribing and making minorities dependent on their largesse from Union Hall.
      Not that you`ll ever get any real history from the BBC about the USA…unless its Joe Hill, Joan Baez, Steve Earle, Buffy St Marie, Sacco and Vanzetti…basically Zinns book ,namechecking the index A-Z.
      Could do with a series stating this…Mr Preiser or Paxo?…I know who I`d trust!

         0 likes

  4. George R says:
    March 14, 2012 at 11:51 pm

    Also, Muslim Rageh OMAAR (of Islamic Al Jazeera), and the extending Islamisation of Islam Not BBC |(INBBC) programmes.

    Not only has INBBC commissioned Mr OMAAR to make his propaganda INBBC TV series on Islam in Europe, and on Mohammad in the last few years, but now this is extended to an INBBC TV 4 programme (15 March) on that limited subject, ‘art and Islam’.

    The weak pretext for this further Islamic propaganda to be on INBBC TV is that the British Museum has an  exhibition on the hajj currently. Of course, as the subject-matter relates to Islam, out of a combination of fear and political affinity, INBBC commissions its favourite Muslim, Mr OMAAR, to present another INBBC programme giving only a Muslim’s uncritical Islamic view.

    In contrast, the following is an interesting TV subject about a hajj (1979, or 1400 Mecca time) which should be presented by a non-Muslim; but INBBC will censor it out of existence:

    ‘The Siege of Mecca: The Forgotten Uprising’

    (by Y. Trofimov)

    (See ‘look inside’ pages.)

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Siege-Mecca-Forgotten-Uprising/dp/0141034068/ref=sr_1_sc_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1331768707&sr=1-1-spell#reader_0141034068

       0 likes

  5. Span Ows says:
    March 15, 2012 at 7:32 am

    Most of the comments seem off topic…

    I bet Blackie is walking a bit carefully this morning after that brutal shafting.  =-O

       0 likes

  6. matthew rowe says:
    March 15, 2012 at 8:06 am

    A great article and well worth a read ! of course non of this will have any effect on the moron Black as not even Iranian nukes could get through his cloud of self delusion!

       0 likes

  7. Phil Ford says:
    March 15, 2012 at 8:48 am

    I suspect that even if Mr Black or his Comintern associates are aware of the story on Jo Nova’s excellent site, a stony silence will be their grim reply. It’s how The Corporation responds (or, rather, doesn’t respond) to anyone who dares criticize it’s blatantly partisan stance on climate change.

    By stonewalling any dissent, in the finest totalitarian tradition, the BBC effectively shuts down any chance of an exchange of views. Black, being the clueless apparatchik he is – no more than a useful idiot in service to the cause – will dutifully keep his head down and refuse to be drawn.

    It’s how the warmists within The Corporation work: they would prefer to keep the traffic all one-way – they put out the endless pro-AGW propaganda (unsubstantiated, unproven) and we the proles are intended to swallow it without complaint or argument.

       0 likes