American Thinker neatly nails here the Nazi roots that underpin the insidious moonshine about sustainable development. There’s been a seamless evolution pioneered by actual Nazis who escaped the Nurmeberg gallows in the ideas that say we need to get back to nature and stop doing nasty things with fossil fuels. The heirs of these lunatics are now enthroned in the fascist kleptocracy that calls itself the UN. As their latest assault on the enterprise and economic development that has improved the lives of billions who live on the planet, the sinisterly-named High Level Panel on Sustainability has published today a report which, if adopted by the Rio Summit this year, could lead to the systematic dismantling of civilized living, including the ending of all subsidies on fossil fuel. Richard Black, of course, does not see a problem. He sings the report’s praises with unmoderated enthusiasm, rounding it all off with an ecstatic quote from the Stakeholder Forum, a bunch of eco-crazed nutters who are led by one Felix Dodds, who claims his many credentials include “writing for the BBC website”. How very apt.
Archives
- May 2013 (68)
- April 2013 (90)
- March 2013 (106)
- February 2013 (83)
- January 2013 (86)
- December 2012 (66)
- November 2012 (127)
- October 2012 (98)
- September 2012 (110)
- August 2012 (107)
- July 2012 (151)
- June 2012 (122)
- May 2012 (151)
- April 2012 (105)
- March 2012 (111)
- February 2012 (102)
- January 2012 (110)
- December 2011 (106)
- November 2011 (131)
- October 2011 (131)
- September 2011 (121)
- August 2011 (140)
- July 2011 (138)
- June 2011 (105)
- May 2011 (100)
- April 2011 (77)
- March 2011 (124)
- February 2011 (85)
- January 2011 (117)
- December 2010 (94)
- November 2010 (105)
- October 2010 (144)
- September 2010 (147)
- August 2010 (153)
- July 2010 (128)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (100)
- April 2010 (83)
- March 2010 (103)
- February 2010 (103)
- January 2010 (116)
- December 2009 (118)
- November 2009 (123)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (154)
- August 2009 (135)
- July 2009 (111)
- June 2009 (97)
- May 2009 (114)
- April 2009 (101)
- March 2009 (110)
- February 2009 (107)
- January 2009 (116)
- December 2008 (75)
- November 2008 (85)
- October 2008 (131)
- September 2008 (112)
- August 2008 (70)
- July 2008 (74)
- June 2008 (95)
- May 2008 (60)
- April 2008 (55)
- March 2008 (54)
- February 2008 (61)
- January 2008 (31)
- December 2007 (18)
- November 2007 (32)
- October 2007 (60)
- September 2007 (74)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (51)
- June 2007 (21)
- May 2007 (20)
- April 2007 (24)
- March 2007 (15)
- February 2007 (24)
- January 2007 (53)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (38)
- October 2006 (47)
- September 2006 (35)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (36)
- June 2006 (41)
- May 2006 (28)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (35)
- January 2006 (28)
- December 2005 (66)
- November 2005 (28)
- October 2005 (39)
- September 2005 (36)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (23)
- June 2005 (21)
- May 2005 (30)
- April 2005 (35)
- March 2005 (36)
- February 2005 (36)
- January 2005 (42)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (33)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (39)
- August 2004 (24)
- July 2004 (32)
- June 2004 (27)
- May 2004 (15)
- April 2004 (30)
- March 2004 (39)
- February 2004 (32)
- January 2004 (51)
- December 2003 (49)
- November 2003 (43)
- October 2003 (34)
- September 2003 (38)
Search B-BBC






“writing for the BBC website”
A level of association that is used too often, by a too powerful but unrepresentative few in an upward spiral of mutual reference to and fro to spin up a minority view into something it too often is not.
A bozo ‘writes’ something. It gets tweeted (Does Mr. Dodds get an honorary ‘BBC writer’ credit on his bio with the blessing of those ‘whose views he does not necessarily represent’). The Graun picks it up. The BBC quotes it. The Graun says ‘as quoted by the BBC’. The then BBC says back ‘as quoted on the Graun’. The author is now a BBC Green room ‘expert’ alumnus based on no more than saying what the BBC likes, when often it is what they want to say but cannot directly, either because it is not a view easy to justify, or often downright tribally skewed.
I think I may add that appellation to my CV too, as a few of my pearls have made it to ‘the BBC website’ in the form of blog comments
Excellent Robin!
The roots of the current lime green nazi tendency are indeed to be found in the National Socialism Mark 1…Mark 2 is with us, but just a little more clever( so it thinks!).
The New Age is really just the Nazi Party at prayer….animal rights? vegetarianism…one Europe and a Middle east settlement that favoured the Mufti?…same old song.
Read Rachel Corrie or Carson for the Horst Wessel song, and you`ve got your anthem too!
These people hate other people-less progressive, fatter, smokers and not as “enlightened” as they are. They are gay or have no kids because they hate commitment, unselfish love-and don`t want the human race to continue anyway-the world and its problems will end with them only.
No surprise then that it is these kinds or sour misanthropes that infested the Labour , Liberal and green Parties…and are now all over the national institutions and in high places.
Their green tinged policies are gangrenous, but we let them play with the marsh gas throught the airwaves…indeed we buy it!
Time to get them out, before they get Iran to do for us!
It won’t be long,will it, before they have their wicked way, and take over everything – they’re halfway there already. As I’ve said so many times before, it’ss the stealthy mycelium of common purpose which is infiltrating every government, every organisation, and even the man in the street (but he’s probably not aware of it). Those of us who can see it happening, and kick against it will be rounded up and spirited away. The world is changing, is it unstoppable?
It’s not unstoppable.
Well, I for one would like to know how to apply the brakes…
Dodds contributes copy to the BBC website? How cozy, and how unsurprising.
‘Sustainable’ Liberal-speak for poverty, at least for the masses. Leftists look fondly back to the ‘good old days’ when a tiny elite was supported by the back breaking labor of dependent and docile masses. Granted such an arrangment is ‘unsustainable’ as history proves but they’ll enjoy it while they have it!
Middle Class Leftists are keen to return back to a feudal system, because they see themselves as extracting money from the peasantry and telling them what to do.
The only difference between the nazis and modern beeboids/socialists/greenies is that the nazis wanted to exterminate a minority. This lot have got it in for the majority population, instead.