Be afraid, very afraid. The EU is at it again, warning us this time that we need more action (code more laws, more powers to Brussels) because greedy people are consuming too much and damaging the sacred ‘biodiversity’. It’s all part of the same movement; the Royal Society, cheered on by Richard Black, wants to re-introduce rationing, the EU wants to lock us in a cycle of economic contraction and lights-out poverty that is a thinly-disguised return to the Nazi concept of a lost Aryan paradise. As usual, the blinkered thinking misses the key point that despite all the resources and subsidies thrown at them, the so-called green technologies such as solar panels don’t work. The BBC, of course, pushes the EU propaganda with all its might because it fervently endorses (without a scrap of critical reporting)every step we take towards an EU socialist-fascist superstate. The true nature of EU rule is spelled out by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard here. He outlines with masterly forensic skill how the EU and the euro project have forced Ireland into a servitude – if not enslavement – from which it is unlikely to escape anytime soon.
Archives
- June 2013 (43)
- May 2013 (102)
- April 2013 (90)
- March 2013 (106)
- February 2013 (83)
- January 2013 (86)
- December 2012 (66)
- November 2012 (127)
- October 2012 (98)
- September 2012 (110)
- August 2012 (107)
- July 2012 (151)
- June 2012 (122)
- May 2012 (151)
- April 2012 (105)
- March 2012 (111)
- February 2012 (102)
- January 2012 (110)
- December 2011 (106)
- November 2011 (131)
- October 2011 (131)
- September 2011 (121)
- August 2011 (140)
- July 2011 (138)
- June 2011 (105)
- May 2011 (100)
- April 2011 (77)
- March 2011 (124)
- February 2011 (85)
- January 2011 (117)
- December 2010 (94)
- November 2010 (105)
- October 2010 (144)
- September 2010 (147)
- August 2010 (153)
- July 2010 (128)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (100)
- April 2010 (83)
- March 2010 (103)
- February 2010 (103)
- January 2010 (116)
- December 2009 (118)
- November 2009 (123)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (154)
- August 2009 (135)
- July 2009 (111)
- June 2009 (97)
- May 2009 (114)
- April 2009 (101)
- March 2009 (110)
- February 2009 (107)
- January 2009 (116)
- December 2008 (75)
- November 2008 (85)
- October 2008 (131)
- September 2008 (112)
- August 2008 (70)
- July 2008 (74)
- June 2008 (95)
- May 2008 (60)
- April 2008 (55)
- March 2008 (54)
- February 2008 (61)
- January 2008 (31)
- December 2007 (18)
- November 2007 (32)
- October 2007 (60)
- September 2007 (74)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (51)
- June 2007 (21)
- May 2007 (20)
- April 2007 (24)
- March 2007 (15)
- February 2007 (24)
- January 2007 (53)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (38)
- October 2006 (47)
- September 2006 (35)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (36)
- June 2006 (41)
- May 2006 (28)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (35)
- January 2006 (28)
- December 2005 (66)
- November 2005 (28)
- October 2005 (39)
- September 2005 (36)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (23)
- June 2005 (21)
- May 2005 (30)
- April 2005 (35)
- March 2005 (36)
- February 2005 (36)
- January 2005 (42)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (33)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (39)
- August 2004 (24)
- July 2004 (32)
- June 2004 (27)
- May 2004 (15)
- April 2004 (30)
- March 2004 (39)
- February 2004 (32)
- January 2004 (51)
- December 2003 (49)
- November 2003 (43)
- October 2003 (34)
- September 2003 (38)
Search B-BBC





Biodiversity is the new global warming. The aims remain the same i.e centalization/government control, but now their using a different mechanism to get us there – they know the AGW train has gone off the rails.
So Ireland are complaining that they are being ruled by Brussels, well tough. If they hadn’t changed their collective minds (twice) they could have helped us all to be slightly more in charge over our own destinies. Did they really think that joining the Euro zone and signing the Lisbon treaty was going to make them independant?
It always amazes me how an electorate can change its mind twice. Maybe the Irish are afraid of running their own affairs.
I believe responsibility does not rest purely with the Irish. They were bullied into ratifiying the Lisbon Treaty after saying no during the first referendum. After saying no, they received a huge amount of pressure and an imposed outlook of doom if they didn’t join. Lots of misinformation…rather like the green propaganda. So they ran the referendum again – if you don’t like the result then keep running the elections until you get a result you’re comfortable with. Or even better, just ignore the referendum results altogether. Or finally, don’t bother to have a referendum at all, then you don’t need to ignore the results. The EU commisioners will do anything to prevent EU failure and will make up any nonsense to protect the growth of the empire. It is truely dreadful, very dangerous, and these sort of mistakes are littered throughout history.
Indeed.
However and on a slightly more humorous note, Brian Cowen coming to the fore in front of the media to explain where all the money has gone, isn’t going to help one bit.
Why ?
Because he has an uncanny resemblence to Mike Bassett – England Manager.
If you’ve seen the film, then expect poor old Brian to trade Benson and Hedges to Lisbon anytime soon.
Otherwise only poetry will be left ! (And the debt of course).
John
I was working in Ireland last year and the response from my colleagues at least (professional office in Dublin, which may not be representative) was that, since their “no” votes had been ignored and another “no” would only result in a third (and fourth, fifth etc) attempt, they may as well stay at home in teh warm rather than turn out to waste a vote. Such defeatism is certainly frustrating, but it can be understood.
I suppose the awful Richard Black would agree with this. After all he and the bBC censor opposing views every day.
Inasmuch as asking questions is now grounds across the BBc to head for the bunker and close up shop, especially on Mr. Black’s blog, one suspects you are correct.
‘Daily Mail’s Mary Ellen Synon makes a point of clarification to describe the political direction of travel of the E.U. a point which BBC-Brussels avoids:
Where the EU intends to go: not federal power, centralised power
No wonder the ‘Daily Express’s campaign to get Britain out of the EU is proving popular, with news items like the following, just today, which BBC-Brussels may consider reporting/censoring:
“ILLEGALS FLOOD INTO EU THROUGH GREECE”
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/214797/Illegals-flood-into-EU-through-Greece
“EUROPEAN COURT COULD FREE YORKSHIRE RIPPER ”
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/214799/European-Court-could-free-Yorkshire-Ripper
“EU BAIL-OUT BOMBSHELL ”
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/214554/EU-bail-out-bombshell
At least Radio 4 ‘File on Four’ has this example of EU corrupt payments:
“Fears over ‘widespread’ EU fraud involving the Mafia”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11848048
Whether ‘File on Four’ will continue its investigations into EU corruption, and whether it will report the EU from a British viewpoint, and not from a Brussels viewpoint, remains to be seen.
If energy rationing comes in what’ll happen to TV factories mass manufacturing stuff like Eastenders, Casualty, Doctors and Holby City?
Or those jumbo jets full of BBC staff which seem to be required at every distant event?
Most probably nothing. They’ll carry on as normal despite any alleged eco-apocalypse.
The affluent BBC will behave like nearly all affluent greens. It’ll continue with its ‘do as we say, not as we do’ policy.
Its happened again. How many times before it becomes climate?
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/uk_snow_dundeeuni.jpg
Today, BBC-Brussels has an article by S. Flanders:
“If Germany left the Eurozone”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/stephanieflanders/2010/12/if_germany_left_the_eurozone.html
Will BBC-Brussels have an even more relevant article next week?:
‘When Britain leaves the European Union.’
[See 'Daily Express', not BBC-Brussels for more information on that.]
“EUROPE CRUSADE: EURO BAIL-OUT COSTS UK HOUSEHOLDS £800 A YEAR”
Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/215112/Europe-crusade-Euro-bail-out-costs-UK-households-800-a-yearEurope-crusade-Euro-bail-out-costs-UK-households-800-a-year#ixzz173EGA5cx
Robin,
Just wanted to bring your attention to this program before it disappears from iPlayer.
Although nominally the program isn’t about Climate Change, it doesn’t take long to see this is exactly where they are ultimately heading.
This was a classic BBC attempt to put a populist face and reasoning on it’s refusal to report any sceptical climate news.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00wfnqg/Royal_Television_Society_Lecture_Huw_Wheldon_Lecture_2010_Science_a_challenge_to_TV_Orthodoxy/