BBC reports that “western forces” have killed at least ten civilians, including eight schoolchildren, during an air strike in eastern part of Afghanistan. This can’t be confirmed owing to the presence of Taliban in the area which, I suppose, might just explain the reason for the air strike in the first place. The BBC seems to glide past that minor point in its’ desire to paint “western forces” as bloodthirsty child-killers. Know your enemy.
Archives
- June 2013 (42)
- May 2013 (102)
- April 2013 (90)
- March 2013 (106)
- February 2013 (83)
- January 2013 (86)
- December 2012 (66)
- November 2012 (127)
- October 2012 (98)
- September 2012 (110)
- August 2012 (107)
- July 2012 (151)
- June 2012 (122)
- May 2012 (151)
- April 2012 (105)
- March 2012 (111)
- February 2012 (102)
- January 2012 (110)
- December 2011 (106)
- November 2011 (131)
- October 2011 (131)
- September 2011 (121)
- August 2011 (140)
- July 2011 (138)
- June 2011 (105)
- May 2011 (100)
- April 2011 (77)
- March 2011 (124)
- February 2011 (85)
- January 2011 (117)
- December 2010 (94)
- November 2010 (105)
- October 2010 (144)
- September 2010 (147)
- August 2010 (153)
- July 2010 (128)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (100)
- April 2010 (83)
- March 2010 (103)
- February 2010 (103)
- January 2010 (116)
- December 2009 (118)
- November 2009 (123)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (154)
- August 2009 (135)
- July 2009 (111)
- June 2009 (97)
- May 2009 (114)
- April 2009 (101)
- March 2009 (110)
- February 2009 (107)
- January 2009 (116)
- December 2008 (75)
- November 2008 (85)
- October 2008 (131)
- September 2008 (112)
- August 2008 (70)
- July 2008 (74)
- June 2008 (95)
- May 2008 (60)
- April 2008 (55)
- March 2008 (54)
- February 2008 (61)
- January 2008 (31)
- December 2007 (18)
- November 2007 (32)
- October 2007 (60)
- September 2007 (74)
- August 2007 (61)
- July 2007 (51)
- June 2007 (21)
- May 2007 (20)
- April 2007 (24)
- March 2007 (15)
- February 2007 (24)
- January 2007 (53)
- December 2006 (20)
- November 2006 (38)
- October 2006 (47)
- September 2006 (35)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (36)
- June 2006 (41)
- May 2006 (28)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (35)
- January 2006 (28)
- December 2005 (66)
- November 2005 (28)
- October 2005 (39)
- September 2005 (36)
- August 2005 (19)
- July 2005 (23)
- June 2005 (21)
- May 2005 (30)
- April 2005 (35)
- March 2005 (36)
- February 2005 (36)
- January 2005 (42)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (33)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (39)
- August 2004 (24)
- July 2004 (32)
- June 2004 (27)
- May 2004 (15)
- April 2004 (30)
- March 2004 (39)
- February 2004 (32)
- January 2004 (51)
- December 2003 (49)
- November 2003 (43)
- October 2003 (34)
- September 2003 (38)
Search B-BBC
} – 
Maybe it was a Christmas party?
Ooops. Forgot. Muslims in Islamo-countries don’t allow that sort of thang.
Mohammedans in their shitty homelands are not very tolerant y’know, despite the dhimmi BBCs lies.
Clearly the Taliban are great wedding goers. I hope they take useful presents for the happy couple.
But what is the point of a party if the aren’t allowed any booze?
Every bit of this report is speculation. No facts at all.
“Also on Monday, militants were reported to have stormed a police checkpoint in north-western Badghis province.
Two police officers were killed and three are missing, said local officials.”
But this bit put at the end of the “report” has been confirmed – so why is that not the news and not the highly speculative and unconfirmed main report?
“The BBC’s commitment to accuracy is a core editorial value and fundamental to our reputation. Our output must be well sourced, based on sound evidence, thoroughly tested and presented in clear, precise language. We should be honest and open about what we don’t know and avoid unfounded speculation.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/editorialguidelines/edguide/accuracy/
Maybe they should add “unless it smears ‘western forces’”
Of course the term “school children” hides the reality of the taliban use of children as fighters, they could be aged upto eighteen and they could be trainee taliban fighters, the taliban takes teenagers from the terrorist incubators called madrassas and then trains them in suicide bombing and IED placement, they do this in small groups in out of the way places, each training group consists of a small training staff and perhaps a dozen or so trainees and its likely that a drone caught a couple of toyota pick ups loaded with trainees going on a training mission, the truth may never be known but that will not stop the BBC reporting the partisan propaganda of the enemy, they will believe what the enemy tells them befre they believe their own side, what kind of state broadcaster would peddle enemy propaganda to their own civilian population while demonizing their own sides troops as baby killers?
Interesting that when it comes to events like this the leftie beeboids seem happy to take the word of a corrupt twat like Karzi.
Them A-rabs sho’ does like themselves a wedding.
The other day I heard some BBC idiot say “We can’t say “our troops” – because the BBC does not have an army”
Smart-arse git, I’d love to walk him into some sergeants’ mess in Afghanistan, give him some education.
I think that the UK forces AND Israel should forbid all BBC reporters. Why have any truck with the enemy ?
I know the BBC have been pulled up about this many times, they could of course simply refer to OUR soldiers as “our licence fee payers” instead being as all the soldiers out in Afghanistan still have to pay their TV licence back in the UK.
After 9/11 the USA had the ideal window (of opportunity) to turn Afghanistan into a sheet of glass – and nobody would have batted an eyelid.
They did not.
Why?
The BBC are the enemy, they should be treated as such.
This sort of ‘reporting’ is just begging a treason trial. That’s the least we can do for our squaddies defending our freedom while these treacherous scum try to squander their sacrifice.
I always get the feeling that the more the Taliban try to discredit a strike against them the more successful it has been. If Britain was a sane country, every time the BBC runs reports like these they would have a visit from MI5 to investigate the BBC’s sources, with due action being taken if the story – ‘if’ – proves not to have a valid basis.
hippiepooter
Trust me most in the military hate the BBC, when I served plenty would have happily put a bullet in a beeboid given the chance. Just check out some of the military forums to fond out what soldiers think of the scum at TV centre.
Can anyone tell me the last time the BBC told us about any member of the Taliban being killed?
If the Beeboids don’t feel they are “our troops”, they should drop the word British from their title.
Great article in the Telegraph about the arse licking of Islam by the leftists.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6903728/Detroit-terror-attack-A-murderous-ideology-tolerated-for-too-long.html?state=target#postacomment&postingId=6906580
Very good telegraph piece. I posted this comment:
Hmm, nowt more to be said but ‘right on’!
Unfortunately our authorities adhering to the most basic norms of sanity in dealing with the worst evil since Hitler is a very remote possibility. That’s because there is too much moaning and too little doing by the ‘Great British Public’.
Our system has been effectively ‘shanghaied’ by the subversives of the Marxist Left who identify with Islamism as a totalitarian evil that can further their own ends. We need to recognise the dual evil in our midst and simply destroy it. Fat chance the way we’re heading. Too few willing to stick their necks out for love of country and love of freedom.