well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
tomo April 26, 2024 at 8:21 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1783893674805571829
Zephir April 26, 2024 at 8:19 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024Now, let us all ingonore the above and sing the bbc mantra, it's simple to learn, goes something like Far...
tomo April 26, 2024 at 8:17 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024An anniversary the BBC will ignore shame on them https://twitter.com/somersetlevel/status/1783929118297395248
Zephir April 26, 2024 at 8:17 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024Even AOL news: "Reading terror attack: Deaths of three men ‘probably avoidable’ after failings. The Reading terror attacks in which...
tomo April 26, 2024 at 8:05 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024https://twitter.com/DonLueders/status/1783495042134335506
tomo April 26, 2024 at 7:51 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024We know she's rubbish, now we know that they know that she's rubbish at "protecting" a trash POTUS [img]https://i.ibb.co/rvG9zgt/nyp...
tomo April 26, 2024 at 7:43 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024Since the BBC is very unlikely to comment... https://twitter.com/7Kiwi/status/1783819089439264872
Guest Who April 26, 2024 at 7:07 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024What they need is a quick 3/4 million. https://x.com/afneil/status/1783918888142450987?s=61 How to avoid repeated embarrassments: Could some...
Guest Who April 26, 2024 at 7:03 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024https://x.com/adissentient/status/1783821326861402435?s=61 This is very cult-like isn't it? Very BBC.
Zephir April 26, 2024 at 6:54 pm on Midweek 24th April 2024@Guest Who The most urgent irony alert, for me: Looking a various album reviews, I happened upon one in the...
well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
0 likes
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes