well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
Up2snuff March 29, 2024 at 9:44 am on Midweek 27th March 2024BBC WEB-SITE Watch #1 - And now a complaint about the non-Christian BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-68690923 The BBC appear...
Thoughtful March 29, 2024 at 9:37 am on Midweek 27th March 2024There is a story today of Thames Water and its financial difficulties, and having followed the story of this for...
Guest Who March 29, 2024 at 9:30 am on Midweek 27th March 2024Interesting stuff North of the border. https://x.com/kulganofcrydee/status/1773619404346949676?s=61 Fury as Gaza war surgeon who hailed terr...
MarkyMark March 29, 2024 at 9:29 am on Midweek 27th March 2024What is the demographic for the NBA? According to racial equality activist Richard Lapchick, the NBA in 2021 was composed...
Guest Who March 29, 2024 at 9:27 am on Midweek 27th March 2024Hummer turning Bute House into a mosque, and then… https://x.com/bbcr4today/status/1773626152340398132?s=61 Richard Taylor, the father of mu...
atlas_shrugged March 29, 2024 at 9:24 am on Midweek 27th March 2024A lot of very fed up farmers in London on 25=Mar-24: https://rumble.com/v4lx060-farmers-protest-london-25th-march-2024-part-3.html Obviously...
AsISeeIt March 29, 2024 at 9:18 am on Midweek 27th March 2024"The Lesser-Known History of African-American Cowboys" "One in four cowboys was black. So why aren’t they more present in popular...
MarkyMark March 29, 2024 at 9:09 am on Midweek 27th March 2024THE 13 TRUTHS - JORDAN PETERSON - INCREDIBLE SPEECH that's relevant to that do not cast pearls before swine and...
well how very ridiculous. the entire sou address represents the views of the administration and republicans or if you must, “the right”. to balance the views expressed you get commentary from the rest of the political spectrum, pretty much from a group similar to that gathered by the bbc… duh!
0 likes
JayJ, the supposed purpose of the BBC article is to look at what “pundits” in the USA said about the President’s State of the Union address (it even mentions “most American media pundits” in the first paragraph). It does not purport to be an opportunity for politically opposing views to be aired as a ‘balance’ to the address.
A BBC review of the output of “pundit” response to the speech should (to fulfil the requirements of impartiality) look at the views from pundits across the political spectrum.
If you are able to move beyond your misconception of what the BBC article is supposed to be about, you might want to ask yourself why the BBC chooses to ignore the views of pundits who spoke in support of the President.
.
0 likes